dostacos
Dan
David Murphy said:Well, yes granted that *if* you shoot a lot at the near limit of the lens and *if* the lens is used wide open (or nearly so) most of the time and *if* you don't mind the horrific distortion of a wide angle on most subjects when used up close and *if* you've got a camera with a whooping bright and contrasty rangefinder patch that is very accurately calibrated and *if* you can't estimate a near distance at arms length within +/- 1.2 feet (or so), RF coupling may be handy!! Seems like a lot of "bucks" for a lot of "ifs".
(If you go and calculate more realistic shooting scenarios with a DOF calculator you will see that the 25/4 has remarkable DOF under most common conditions.)
On the other hand, no one is in the rangefinder lens/camera game for purely rational reasons (certainly not me) and we can always use more lenses, so actually I welcome it to the fold. I do think CV had a great idea though when they came up with the the original 25/4 which I own and adore. Its good quality and moderate price cracked what was previously an insanely overpriced market of lenses catering mostly to the photographic elite.
I am more comfortable with having a lens coupled and I guess I am not as much a purist in RFs