Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
I'm mystified by this rather strange phenomenon that goes on with my photography ... it seems that the better the gear I use the less I like my output a lot of the time.
I honestly can't remember in the time I owned my M8 that I took any photos that really grabbed me ... the D700 has much the same effect on me, everything just seems OK and undeniably it is a great camera as was the M8! It's not a film V digital situation either because my M3 and M2 along with my Ikon are pretty much in the same boat. I haven't taken a photograph with any of these incredibly good cameras for ages that has really, really pleased me!
I've just put a couple of rolls through my rather supect Kiev ll (FSU Comp) and as annoying as the camera is with it's incredibly bad ergonomics, awful viewfinder and occasional mystery light leak, the pics from these two rolls of film have given me more pleasure than anything I've taken for a long time. The framing of many of the shots is definitely not quite what I was seeing in the viewfinder a lot of the time, which is typical FSU I guess, but that seems to matter little ... I love the results, more so than anything I've shot for quite a while now.
What it is about these 'junk' cameras ... does the diversity of the design just encourage you to 'imagine' you've done better than you actually have or is there something going on here that I don't understand ... has anyone else experienced this?
I honestly can't remember in the time I owned my M8 that I took any photos that really grabbed me ... the D700 has much the same effect on me, everything just seems OK and undeniably it is a great camera as was the M8! It's not a film V digital situation either because my M3 and M2 along with my Ikon are pretty much in the same boat. I haven't taken a photograph with any of these incredibly good cameras for ages that has really, really pleased me!
I've just put a couple of rolls through my rather supect Kiev ll (FSU Comp) and as annoying as the camera is with it's incredibly bad ergonomics, awful viewfinder and occasional mystery light leak, the pics from these two rolls of film have given me more pleasure than anything I've taken for a long time. The framing of many of the shots is definitely not quite what I was seeing in the viewfinder a lot of the time, which is typical FSU I guess, but that seems to matter little ... I love the results, more so than anything I've shot for quite a while now.
What it is about these 'junk' cameras ... does the diversity of the design just encourage you to 'imagine' you've done better than you actually have or is there something going on here that I don't understand ... has anyone else experienced this?