I’m sure there are a number of photographers who shoot film for commercial work (but ultimately it likely has to be scanned for most commercial applications and become seemingly 'digitized'?), but for my personal commercial work, I haven’t shot film for clients in 20 years. This might possibly be due to the particular type of work I do. They all want it quick quick nowadays (sometimes either instantly, same day or next day), and I need to be able to turn it around on a dime. Plus they often want to look at the photos in real time on a laptop so assessments and adjustments can be made - particularly for architectural interiors and food photography. And if I’m shooting something that involves multiple lighting setups, I don’t want to discover that one of my lights wasn’t firing only after I got the film back from the lab. So for me personally, no, film isn’t presently part of the equation.
As an aside, digital has been a bit of a mixed blessing for me -- the ability to get the instant feedback and for your clients to see it (a little better than the peel-apart Polaroids of the olden days) is definitely helpful, but the demands of having to turn it around quicker and possibly having to do all the retouching work yourself (and that has definitely resulted in physical repercussions). And oftentimes, it's not just stills that are needed -- it's also video, drone, Matterport, virtual tours, instantly posting to social media....well, you get the idea.
