R
ruben
Guest
First of all, I would like that no one get offended here.
Therefore, since the term "amateur" can be contraposed to the term "professional" I would like to clean the table concerning professionals.
There is a gross misunderstanding or prejudice in the stereotype that a professional is a mercenary shooting for money.
I mayself had been in close contact with many pros, from Israel and overseas, and found a single case in which I can speak about an eye gifted pro working for money and great disregard about the people photographed. A pro too has his sense of what is right and wrong, and I have met pros with very high sense of what is right or wrong. I think sitemistic is a good example of them, within RFF.
But the question I would like to pose is who are we, the RFF members, in the food chain of photography. What good things we all have in common and should be aware of very much.
In my opinion we are a very dynamic mass of people, very serioous about what we want to do.
Many of us have a great interest in gear, me included, and I cannot find any wrong here. Some of us have quite a very high knowledge of gear and we all are proud of them being part of us.
Also among us there are quite a lot of people with deep understanding of the hystory of photography. This is another great asset not found cheap on the streets of success. My deepest respect to these folks and my greatest hope they continue to contribute with their knowledge.
We have among us too, a big mass of anonymous shooters, whose pictures don't get commented. Each of them must have a great nerve to stand this situation. They deserve my respect, and my feeling of pride for them continuing within the RFF.
Then we have here too excellent shooters of the highest quality. Up to the point that from time to time exceptional fine art shooters do find RFF a nice place to display.
The last row of image promotion we have had, led both by Stephen and Jon, each one from his side, is a proof we are broad minded and sensible for the end result, the image.
In this list I would not like to forget some folks who have shown being people of extremely fine personal character, being another privilege of RFF.
So there is much Leica and gear talk here. Is this our sin ? Not at all. Leica is a legendary camera encroached with the very hystory of photographty. It fills much of our imagination and emotional associations with photography.
As for gear in general, in my experience, the most sophysticated photographers feel the same pleasure in touching-talking-being curious about a piece of gear, like any one among us. They just have less time for it. Our deep knowledge of old gear is a further twist for good in the equation.
There is another aspect to our existance, quite unique. Many photographers everywhere do street photography. But at the level of promoting street photography, our site is number one in holding the fire of this great torch.
And, no need to say, we all are intelligent people. Here, I admit to have a personal issue. I don't stand much some lunatics appearing from time to time, like some weeks ago in the Weekly Picks, telling us 'good efforts - continue !'
I call this breed "lunatic", because I have also known extremely well paid photographers, eye gifted, that beyond being eye-gifted are a round zero as human beings. One of the most repulsive things to see is an artist without soul, a kind of kid with his finger permanently digging within his nose. Knowing and speaking about himself and nothing else, i, e, not knowing even himself. Had this been the only way to be a great artist I would choose to be the worst shooter on Earth.
I am very happy of Stephen being the owner and his staff. He is a dynamic personality as well. he has introduced many good changes and will continue.
So what I am saying with all these ? We deserve respect. Respect in the deepest sense, not in the formal one. But first of all we deserve respecting ourselves. Let's not forget it for a single moment. We are a valuable international bunch of folks in the Photography world. We are not at all an amorphic mass of ignorants. Are we reckognized as such ? Pitty minded may worry about it. But we should be crystal clear about who we are.
Now I am sure not everything is perfect. Yet I would like that this thread wouldn't change into a complaints one, but rather into one adding to my list of pluses.
Cheers,
Ruben
Therefore, since the term "amateur" can be contraposed to the term "professional" I would like to clean the table concerning professionals.
There is a gross misunderstanding or prejudice in the stereotype that a professional is a mercenary shooting for money.
I mayself had been in close contact with many pros, from Israel and overseas, and found a single case in which I can speak about an eye gifted pro working for money and great disregard about the people photographed. A pro too has his sense of what is right and wrong, and I have met pros with very high sense of what is right or wrong. I think sitemistic is a good example of them, within RFF.
But the question I would like to pose is who are we, the RFF members, in the food chain of photography. What good things we all have in common and should be aware of very much.
In my opinion we are a very dynamic mass of people, very serioous about what we want to do.
Many of us have a great interest in gear, me included, and I cannot find any wrong here. Some of us have quite a very high knowledge of gear and we all are proud of them being part of us.
Also among us there are quite a lot of people with deep understanding of the hystory of photography. This is another great asset not found cheap on the streets of success. My deepest respect to these folks and my greatest hope they continue to contribute with their knowledge.
We have among us too, a big mass of anonymous shooters, whose pictures don't get commented. Each of them must have a great nerve to stand this situation. They deserve my respect, and my feeling of pride for them continuing within the RFF.
Then we have here too excellent shooters of the highest quality. Up to the point that from time to time exceptional fine art shooters do find RFF a nice place to display.
The last row of image promotion we have had, led both by Stephen and Jon, each one from his side, is a proof we are broad minded and sensible for the end result, the image.
In this list I would not like to forget some folks who have shown being people of extremely fine personal character, being another privilege of RFF.
So there is much Leica and gear talk here. Is this our sin ? Not at all. Leica is a legendary camera encroached with the very hystory of photographty. It fills much of our imagination and emotional associations with photography.
As for gear in general, in my experience, the most sophysticated photographers feel the same pleasure in touching-talking-being curious about a piece of gear, like any one among us. They just have less time for it. Our deep knowledge of old gear is a further twist for good in the equation.
There is another aspect to our existance, quite unique. Many photographers everywhere do street photography. But at the level of promoting street photography, our site is number one in holding the fire of this great torch.
And, no need to say, we all are intelligent people. Here, I admit to have a personal issue. I don't stand much some lunatics appearing from time to time, like some weeks ago in the Weekly Picks, telling us 'good efforts - continue !'
I call this breed "lunatic", because I have also known extremely well paid photographers, eye gifted, that beyond being eye-gifted are a round zero as human beings. One of the most repulsive things to see is an artist without soul, a kind of kid with his finger permanently digging within his nose. Knowing and speaking about himself and nothing else, i, e, not knowing even himself. Had this been the only way to be a great artist I would choose to be the worst shooter on Earth.
I am very happy of Stephen being the owner and his staff. He is a dynamic personality as well. he has introduced many good changes and will continue.
So what I am saying with all these ? We deserve respect. Respect in the deepest sense, not in the formal one. But first of all we deserve respecting ourselves. Let's not forget it for a single moment. We are a valuable international bunch of folks in the Photography world. We are not at all an amorphic mass of ignorants. Are we reckognized as such ? Pitty minded may worry about it. But we should be crystal clear about who we are.
Now I am sure not everything is perfect. Yet I would like that this thread wouldn't change into a complaints one, but rather into one adding to my list of pluses.
Cheers,
Ruben
Last edited by a moderator: