Turtle
Veteran
surely thats not possible from Xrays as it would have to pass thru the outer layers wrapped around the spool? side on it would be so precise as to miss ou the outer layers. I'm no expert but this once again counds like something else. I got weird bading on some 10x8 fiml that sounded unlike X-Rays, but i never found the other cause either, but from examples online, there is no doubt it was not the Xrays that did it. weird!
Turtle
Veteran
I've had film scanned a dozen or so times and seen no problems - long may it continue. Guess I will be trying for a hand search on the Ilford 3200 on the next trip but i bet its fine scanned as per usual with an effective speed of 1000 or so. Guess 10 scans on iso 400 = lots more exposure than a couple on 100.
Avotius
Some guy
I have had my share of xray damaged film myself, despite that places say their xray machines are film safe they just are not...
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I've put Ilford 3200 through the carryon scanner for two exposures, with no problem.
Svitantti
Well-known
X-ray machines should be safe for film, at least in modern places. X-ray bags wont help, they just have to give the bag a higher volume of X-ray to see through it - This is what I have heard.
It really looks like a light leak to me - faulty seals.
A friend just had something like this with a Yashica RF. I didn't check the negatives but I'm guessing it was just like this...
It really looks like a light leak to me - faulty seals.
A friend just had something like this with a Yashica RF. I didn't check the negatives but I'm guessing it was just like this...
Last edited:
ElectroWNED
Well-known
I don't know why you guys are saying it was the seals...
Those last two color shots were made after my trip, and not a single shot on the roll had any defect to it. (Developed at Walmart)
Granted, that roll was shot within a matter of 10 minutes and developed immediately after.
I have had a roll in the camera for about a month now; I'm going to finish it up now and get it developed 1 hour @ Walmart to see the results...
Those last two color shots were made after my trip, and not a single shot on the roll had any defect to it. (Developed at Walmart)
Granted, that roll was shot within a matter of 10 minutes and developed immediately after.
I have had a roll in the camera for about a month now; I'm going to finish it up now and get it developed 1 hour @ Walmart to see the results...
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Lots of us seem to be unable to believe that x-ray damage can happen. When only the films that have gone through the x-ray machine are affected, and those films are shot with different bodies and processed in different cans I don't know what else it would be. But that's me. I'm a moron.
FrankS
Registered User
No you're not, Bob! Does anyone have any x-ray damaged images to post here?
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Next time I scan I'll post the tail of one of these rolls.
ElectroWNED
Well-known
*It was the same body every time
I wasn't able to finish this roll of film because of an immobile car, but perhaps I can tomorrow(?) If I do, it should be pretty clear whether the problem was x-rays or Ritz
Last edited:
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Well, I went and scanned it.
There was a quite similar, but not identical, fog on the tail of the four rolls I brought to CA. The four rolls were run through two bodies, and were developed in two different cans on different days. No other films from the same brick had this. Seems like a big coincidence to me.
This went into the image area on at least one of the rolls, I'll get a scan of this at some point.
There was a quite similar, but not identical, fog on the tail of the four rolls I brought to CA. The four rolls were run through two bodies, and were developed in two different cans on different days. No other films from the same brick had this. Seems like a big coincidence to me.
This went into the image area on at least one of the rolls, I'll get a scan of this at some point.
FrankS
Registered User
Thanks Bob. I'm wondering about colour film. What colour(s) do x-rays record as?
ElectroWNED
Well-known
well, all of you who said it didn't look like x-ray damage: you were right.
I just got a fresh roll of Superia back from Walmart, and it has lines in it. A few came out bad:
and a few came out okay:
In the end, it looks like I paid $60 for a non-functioning Electro 35 from a fellow RFF member!
I just got a fresh roll of Superia back from Walmart, and it has lines in it. A few came out bad:
and a few came out okay:
In the end, it looks like I paid $60 for a non-functioning Electro 35 from a fellow RFF member!
micromontenegro
Well-known
That is a light leak if there ever was one. Maybe a simple foam job will cure it?
Gaspar
Established
Light leak, definetely.
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Where? And what was it like?
(Not calling you a liar -- just interested to see/hear the reaction)
Cheers,
R.
wolves3012
Veteran
X-rays are high energy (short wavelength) so they'd affect all layers the same and hence show as white on any film (at least, I think that logic is right!)
kyre
BNSOP - student
Most modern securetie "X-ray" systems are film safe. But you if you travel a lot to third world countries you should take extra care as they often use older higher power machines. I have brought films (out of date c41 and e6) traveling trhoug six different airports and seeing no ill efectts (all in europe)
hehe my first post on the forum
and im just adding to a dead discussion
hehe my first post on the forum
and im just adding to a dead discussionRoger Hicks
Veteran
I believe it happens; I've seen it. But I have also seen a lot of things that have been held up as X-ray damage and aren't.
Cheers,
R.
ElectroWNED
Well-known
thanks for resurrecting this thread
I signed up for the only Photography class my college offers, and will start at the end of January. I want to use this Yashica in combination with the HP5 I have stockpiled in my fridge.
To do so, I'm going to have to replace the seals. Looking on eBay, this is the most visible result: http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Finest-Complete-Camera-Light-Seal-Foam-Kit-PROOF_W0QQitemZ120336366997QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item120336366997&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318
Does anybody have experience with that kit? I am not horribly gifted as a tinkerer/mechanic, but this kit looks to be fairly user-friendly. If you guys have any other suggestions for replacing the seals, I'm open to suggestions!
I signed up for the only Photography class my college offers, and will start at the end of January. I want to use this Yashica in combination with the HP5 I have stockpiled in my fridge.
To do so, I'm going to have to replace the seals. Looking on eBay, this is the most visible result: http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Finest-Complete-Camera-Light-Seal-Foam-Kit-PROOF_W0QQitemZ120336366997QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item120336366997&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318
Does anybody have experience with that kit? I am not horribly gifted as a tinkerer/mechanic, but this kit looks to be fairly user-friendly. If you guys have any other suggestions for replacing the seals, I'm open to suggestions!