Bill Blackwell
Leica M Shooter
And the runner up ...
For marketing majors, and many internet camera forums, the main job, at which they are often successful, is to convince people that the worst camera of all time was the one they bought 3 years ago.
The Pixii.
And the runner up ...
![]()
This must be a joke. The best of the best.And the runner up ...
![]()
With all due respect, Bill, I strongly beg to differ. Worst camera of all time? Maybe very, very ugly, but I have no arguments with ugly. 😉
This must be a joke. The best of the best. ...
That's too funny! I Googled "worst 35mm camera of all time" and 'the Handle' was my first hit - the second was the Kodak Instamatic; I had one when I was kid (man, what a POS). That's where I got the picture(s).Oh my gosh. Earlier this year on an online motorcycle forum that I run, I scanned and posted a series of photos that I taken at a motorcycling-related event back in the 70's when I was a kid. After scanning the photos, I tried to remember what exact camera it was that I had received as a gift when I was young. I could only recall that it was an instamatic of some sort.
I realized as soon as I set eyes on your post that the camera I had owned back then was of course "The Handle" by Kodak. Talk about a flashback (not to be confused with a flashbulb). The Handle might well have been one of the worst cameras ever. I know that I have wished many times over in my adulthood that I had owned a better camera back then. But looking at those and other photos that I took as a child, I'm made aware of the fact that even the worst camera is better than no camera at all.
Yes! Especially the SL2 (a camera I particularly loved, BTW). I've been told by numerous sources (Don Goldberg being one of them) that Leica lost money on every SL2 they sold.I think it shared that honour with the Leicaflex SL Bill.
Strangely both of my absolute favourite cameras (with meters) almost destroyed Leica. As with cars, I do seem to be taken by over-engineered German stuff!
Popular, yes. But so were Time-X watches.Can’t agree with that choice. 126 went away, but back in the day those Kodak Instamatics delivered and were hugely popular.
With all due respect, Bill, I strongly beg to differ. Worst camera of all time? Maybe very, very ugly, but I have no arguments with ugly. 😉
Nimslos were great cameras, Nishikas were horrible. In fact, I would nominate the Nishika as the worst camera ever made! it even has a lead weight in it to make it seem more substantial than it is.Those 3D cameras back in the eighties were pretty terrible. Can't recall their name.
Any 110 snapshot camera. Back in their heyday, every time you collected your photos from the chemist you were reminded how shockingly poor they were: grainy and fuzzy, barely able to hold up in a 4 in. print.


This is so true, Larry! My first serious digital camera was the Sony NEX-5T, which I purchased in 2014. I hardly shoot digital anymore, but all the film images that I share here on the forum are digitized with that camera. If I ever wanted to "un-retire" it and use it for normal stills, I'm sure it would still work great.
I see your Pixii and raise you a Konost. Wait, nevermind...