"The Worst Lens Company Is . . ."

peterm1

Veteran
Local time
12:01 AM
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
8,145
I stumbled on an article with the above title today and thought it interesting enough to put a link up here. https://alikgriffin.com/worst-lens-company/

His focus is on the plethora of new(ish) offerings by Chinese companies - some of which do not always have the best reputation for quality assurance. I cannot really comment in depth as I have not personally tried lenses from any of the companies he mentions other than a Samyang / Rokinon 12mm f2 for M4/3 (which actually is really rather good both optically and mechanically - no complaints from me). His assessment is also necessarily limited by his own experience so I am doubtful that his dismissive comment about 7 Artisans might be regarded as balanced given their most recent offerings (though some people have reported problems with some of them).

But some here may have experience with lenses from some of the companies mentioned, and even if not, may find his comments (mostly from his own experience) useful. Caveat emptor as "they" say. And fore-warned is fore-armed as I say.

As for me I am optimistic. Even if you agree with his assessments, the arc of economic history suggests that these are early days and over time the relevant companies will master the skills and processes needed to reliably manufacture good kit. Many are already showing promise. Or, of course, they may go out of business.

When I was a kid (a baby really) I recall that Japanese items being sold here in Australia often had a reputation amongst my parent's generation as being poor quality junk. Not so of course with Canon, Nikon etc photography equipment (which was outside of most peoples' experience) but in general that was the view of anything labelled 'Made in Japan" (no doubt affected somewhat by their experience of the Pacific War and some residual antipathy towards the Japanese nation). But of course all of that changed over time and the rest is history. I imagine the same will happen with Chinese stuff, even that which today is regarded as a bit of a crap shoot or "dodgy" in the QA department.
 
......

When I was a kid (a baby really) I recall that Japanese items being sold here in Australia often had a reputation amongst my parent's generation as being poor quality junk. Not so of course with Canon, Nikon etc photography equipment (which was outside there experience) but in general that was the view of anything labelled 'Made in Japan" (no doubt affected somewhat by their experience of the Pacific War). But of course all of that changed over time and the rest is history. I imagine the same will happen with Chinese stuff even that which today is regarded as a bit of a crap shoot or "dodgy" in the QA department.


I too am old enough to remember the frequently used term "Jap Junk." And I wasn't a kid!
 
My beloved FIRST SIX camera, has a wonderfully lousy lens: vignette, color aberration, out of focus edges, and probably a few problems that I don't even know about. It was a Japanese company that morphed into Petri Cameras. Somehow I like it. Here is a wide open shot from it:

AristaEDUultra100 AristaPremiumDeveloper by John Carter, on Flickr

and then sometimes you get lucky; all the mess-ups come together:

Ektar100 by John Carter, on Flickr
 
Bad lenses

Bad lenses

Putting aside the ultra small volume, garage manufacture of a few lenses in post-war Japan, I'll nominate the Lauser Company, most known for the infamous Tri-Lauser. which found its way onto a variety of cameras made into the mid-1950s. Ive read that the company was later acquired by the makers of Yashica. Looking at the lesser quality of the lenses mounted in Yashicamat TLRs over the years, that seems consistent.
 
Here's a small nugget of advice for the reviewer. If you are going to post an online critique denoting the "worst" of something, at least make sure your spelling and grammar are impeccable.

"Of all the lenses that I have been using, there is one clear looser ... SLR Magic."
 
it just another article of people who hate the fact that now anyone can have noctilux type of lens for 1/50 of price .. now they have to continue having fantasies about leica glow, something special about leica photos and other insane stuff...
 
even here i feel it too much-i asked if we can make subforum for chinese lenses but everyone ignored me... so everyone has its own subforum but for rff chinese manufacturers are not worthy of having its space despite the fact they have more lenses now than anyone else.
 
it just another article of people who hate the fact that now anyone can have noctilux type of lens for 1/50 of price .. now they have to continue having fantasies about leica glow, something special about leica photos and other insane stuff...

Dude have you even read the article? Its exclusively or almost exclusively about the reliability of the lenses not optical performance except in one or two instances lens optical performance is so bad it is suggestive of poor build quality (decentering etc).
 
unfortunately i read all articles from him and is always same ****.. oh i found some subtance all over 7artisans lsns.. oh my element is unscrewing, focus is flimsy blahblah he has problems noone else had - even with cctv lenses.. so yes he is elitist like most people here...

Dude have you even read the article? Its exclusively or almost exclusively about the reliability of the lenses not optical performance except in one or two instances lens optical performance is so bad it is suggestive of poor build quality (decentering etc).
 
I've got a couple of Industars that may qualify for world's worst. I'll see if I can post the images from them. Then again, I hesitate to inflict them on you gentlemen. One is a 50/3.5 Elmar copy. It's terrible. The other is a 28mm. It's worse.
 
I'm really quite surprised the blogger (what's his name again?!) regards the 7Artisans to be 'Vending Machine Lenses'; completely unjustified from my experience.
 
Wow. I don‘t have Industar lemons. All of them are quite nice, especially the i50 collapsible from LZOS and the 61ld.
 
What can I get for what I’m willing to spend.
That has been my guiding principle in lens buying. IOW, don’t look too close if you are a cheap so and so. It’s just a hobby.
 
exactly - i was so surprised how 7artisans 25mm is good that i got 35/1.2 now also.. ill open one thread for 7artisans so people can share their photos-its a shame and unfair to that company that we dont have it..
I'm really quite surprised the blogger (what's his name again?!) regards the 7Artisans to be 'Vending Machine Lenses'; completely unjustified from my experience.
 
I'm really quite surprised the blogger (what's his name again?!) regards the 7Artisans to be 'Vending Machine Lenses'; completely unjustified from my experience.


I was a little surprised at him nominating 7 Artisans but he did seem to be basing his assessment on a single lens - the 25mm f1.5 for cropped sensor which like many older designs are poor in the corners and does look to be quite primitive in the sense that many 1950s lenses today have quite simple construction. That is not necessarily unfair of itself if it is otherwise well built and does not fall apart but he did seem to suggest he thought it was not well built. As I have said I cannot comment as I have not tried one.

I will say though that I am not wholly averse to simple old lenses that have performance limits if you know what you are getting. If cheap many can be fun. If they have some character that makes them usable though far from optically perfect then they at least have a function.
 
Back
Top Bottom