there is no perfect bag,

Tampons. And. Nick-naks.

So true, one must get the priorities ordered :rolleyes:

It is my modest opinion that a camera should be in your hands, not in a bag.

We all do things differently I suspect ... and I imagine you have many such opinions of which you can be modest

I note many contend there's no such thing as perfect, yet those who own a hadley pro seem to think there is, I think I see a pattern developing here, perhaps?
 
i wonder how the hadley compares to the m classic bag?

anyone here have experience with both?

I've only had the one bag since they stole my hard cases, it's probably just that the hadley is "good enough" and it's just not worth the effort of looking for anything better, I can get in two RFs and a few lenses, two TLRs filters and hoods and stuff or SLRs and a couple of long lenses, and if I'm flying I can transport all I'll need for a holiday as hand luggage.

Then maybe I'm just easily pleased :)
 
I think my Naneu Pro Lima and my small LowePro bags are pretty perfect.

Might be too cheap for some though :)
 
it's not about the cash rollie, for me anyway, but comfort plus ability to hold a variety of camera combos and be able to work easily out of the bag.

not too much to ask, eh?

;)
 
Domke F-802 for me, but I really can't walk for hours with a heavy side bag.
If I'm shooting for long hours, I use a good regular backpack to spare my lumbar and carry water, food and the rest. When not in use, cameras (2) are stuffed in, each one in its "ER" case, usually with one spare lens in a pouch.
 
Hi, i find very usefull my lomography bag it´s sold in an odd combo, this small one with a larger one.
I use only this one, i can stick in it two bodies, three lenses and 5-6 rolls of film.
It´s very small, easy to use, made of thick cloth, has a broad smooth strap and noone notices it.

Take a look!

You may be on to something. I'm a big fan of bags that don't scream "expensive camera inside!" so I avoid the usual big names, especially Lowepro. A bag which is both designed for film camera and screams "cheap toy camera in here, don't bother stealing me!" may just be ideal. :D

Rob
 
I have a few different bags, too. I started with a DSLR so I bought a Lowepro Fastpack 200 which was really nice. However the rangefinder is a bit 'loose' in there. For a while I used my Braun Paxette vintage 35mm film camera which is housed in a peli case all cut to fit the camera and lenses, very neat.

When I got my rangefinder I wanted to have a bag I could use every day for other things like my hard drive and keys, so I bought this little bag from Marks & Spencer (UK) and put the dividers from the Lowepro into it. I used a nice soft bag made for jewellery (I also love watches) in the bottom and it's nice and snug. It lets me grab the camera with one hand and have it in the right position instantly.

I would probably take my larger bags if I wanted to take both cameras with me but for every day the whole point of my new camera was for it to be something I will take everywhere by itself, so all I need room for is the camera, maybe a spare battery or two and a spare SD card, then whatever things I need. Keep it simple and keep it useful!

Not a PERFECT BAG by any means, but one I will definitely find comfortable and not be too precious of every day.

P.s It isn't waterproof of course, but I always carry a huge ziplock bag in the event of crap weather (I'm in the UK remember!!!) so I can stuf the whole bag and myself into it.

Cheers
ped

6570da75.jpg
 
there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag, there is no perfect bag,
:bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::bang::

I find your lack of faith disturbing . . . . .


Dave
 
it's not about the cash rollie, for me anyway, but comfort plus ability to hold a variety of camera combos and be able to work easily out of the bag.

not too much to ask, eh?

;)

I understand. My bags are all slightly modified, basically by strengthening the Velcro attachments of the paddings inside.

With that modification, I love the Lima because it perfectly fits 2 cameras, 4 lenses and a meter, both cameras with lenses attached and they can be quickly drawn out of the bag, the padding is great, the bag outside is nylon and pretty much water resistant; so I can throw the bag around on wet ground, etc, its quite small and fits perfectly in my saddle bag. Because it is nylon it doesn't look like a luxury item, which is just as well. It doesn't yell "man-purse", or "Leica with calf leather Luigi Case inside !", but simply does a perfect job. :D

The small LowePro cases are great, too (a smaller and larger of the Rezo series). A single camera with 3 lenses, or 2 bodies with 2 lenses. Nicely padded, room for extra stuff, and top opens to the right side (away from you), so you can simply draw the camera with lens attached when needed.

When I look at some of the pictures above, I fail to understand why a bag needs to hold 3 bodies or more and 6 lenses or more. I personally just wouldn't know how to use all that stuff, even on a longer trip. I also hate a crowded camera bag :)

Roland.
 
Last edited:
I have a few different bags, too. I started with a DSLR so I bought a Lowepro Fastpack 200 which was really nice. However the rangefinder is a bit 'loose' in there. For a while I used my Braun Paxette vintage 35mm film camera which is housed in a peli case all cut to fit the camera and lenses, very neat.

When I got my rangefinder I wanted to have a bag I could use every day for other things like my hard drive and keys, so I bought this little bag from Marks & Spencer (UK) and put the dividers from the Lowepro into it. I used a nice soft bag made for jewellery (I also love watches) in the bottom and it's nice and snug. It lets me grab the camera with one hand and have it in the right position instantly.

I would probably take my larger bags if I wanted to take both cameras with me but for every day the whole point of my new camera was for it to be something I will take everywhere by itself, so all I need room for is the camera, maybe a spare battery or two and a spare SD card, then whatever things I need. Keep it simple and keep it useful!

Not a PERFECT BAG by any means, but one I will definitely find comfortable and not be too precious of every day.

P.s It isn't waterproof of course, but I always carry a huge ziplock bag in the event of crap weather (I'm in the UK remember!!!) so I can stuf the whole bag and myself into it.

Cheers
ped

6570da75.jpg

I am convinced that altering and modifying what's out there to one's particular needs is the only way to go. Great example above.
 
Back
Top Bottom