This made me drool big time...

The application is quite recent and the drawing looks like R-D1, so Epson have at least one person thinking about a new (successor) camera at some level.

There are some interesting/funny things in the drawings, which may hint at something or be completely irrelevant. Such as a top speed of (at least) 1/4000 and the fact that the aperture values run in the wrong direction (vs. any modern M/LTM glass).
 
I think it's ridiculous.

An RD-2 is a nice idea, but imagine pulling out that lever so that another camera can come out to photograph your camera at the same time as you taking the photos?
 
The application is quite recent and the drawing looks like R-D1, so Epson have at least one person thinking about a new (successor) camera at some level.

At the very least they have someone evaluating the files accumulated in the R-D1 development for intellectual property.
 
lolz.
Not to be a luddite, but this was solved much more elegantly on some manual slr's e.g. minolta something, by placing a window and small mirror that looks onto the top of the lens aperture ring and reflects the set value into the viewfinder. So it's hardly a revolutionary invention.
 
I can see how this may spark new hope for an R-D2. But the solution to the problem (if it is a problem) looks like something my 7 year old would have come up with. Not to mention ugly.
 
pictured solution looks unpractical. maybe its exaggerated so it serves the patent purposes.

SLR's have the hump on top where the aperture reading mechanism was easier to include, in manual-only lens times.
 
I guess what they want to protect is the idea to OCR the lens barrel for lens profiling and inclusion in EXIF data. The rest won't hold up in the presence of that much prior art - peep windows are far from new (IIRC some Zeiss Ikon TLRs already pioneered something similar before WWII), and even solutions for video monitoring lens settings are readily available from motion picture dolly and crane rental places.
 
How complicated and trouble prone can you make a construction? Put it in you bag with the lever extended and it will bend or break or get stuck.
This is combining old school mechanics (swing lever) and high tech. (mini camera) into a second grade solution that nobody (well almost) really needs. What's the purpose besides filing a patent?
 
Back
Top Bottom