Totally Unscientific Generic B&W Film Test

$1.60 = cost per roll (24 shots) of the pseudo XP2 I bought.

Costco costs:

$1.59 = developing
$2.99 = scans to DVD: 3636 × 2432 (3-5 Megabytes)

$5.02 = Total for developing + scans to DVD (this includes tax).

Currently, I simply don't have time to develop and scan myself. I hope to get back to it soon though 😀.
 
$1.60 = cost per roll (24 shots) of the pseudo XP2 I bought.

Costco costs:

$1.59 = developing
$2.99 = scans to DVD: 3636 × 2432 (8.8 MP)

$5.02 = Total for developing + scans to DVD (this includes tax).

Currently, I simply don't have time to develop and scan myself. I hope to get back to it soon though 😀.

Oh, yes.. a third class film plus the development problems, scanning issues, dusts, flecks and scratches are free too.. 😀
 
Hi,

Been thinking about this.

We are used to buying 35mm negative film in short lengths in metal cans or cassettes. Somewhere there's a factory making B&W 35mm negative film by the mile and then cutting it up into (say) 400ft lengths for the cine camera users. They get to the end of the run and the roll can only be (say) 290ft long. So they scribble on the label 290 ft and put it to one side. Every now and again a dealer in (say) China buys all these cans of odd lengths and takes them back to China and puts them into cassettes...

Or, the factory notice a scratch on the film and scrap the batch or rather sell it off cheaply like supermarkets do. You know, 20 % off, then 50%off then 90% off then free to staff. My betting is they still make a profit as they allow for this to happen.

More to the point, we only know the retail price of minute lengths of 35mm film after several middle men have handled it. The factory may sell it dirt cheaply and still cover their costs on this (say) 1% of their run.

I've know this happen with other items made by the mile and sold in similar ways. A bloke I know runs a small firm and makes things using only these off cuts and he told me he paid 50p a metre and retail it costs about 12 quid a metre... But the factory ring him and tell him they've a lot for sale and he either takes the lot or goes without.

Just my 2d worth.

Regards, David
 
My order of pseudo XP2 arrived today.

Points of interest:

1. They do have a DX coding sticker applied to the film canisters.
2. The DX coding sticker indicates they are 36 exposure rolls.
3. The canisters indicate they are 27 exposure rolls (I believe this is the correct number).
4. The film tip appears to have a kink in it like it was previously rolled (perhaps they actually are taken from a dissembled one time shoot / disposable camera as previously mentioned?).
5. The film appears to have some kind of a orange type mask layer.

Here's a couple photos of a roll of film:

6780485783_35d461d766.jpg


6780485683_fff0f78f5e.jpg


6780485563_894a00379a.jpg


I plan to shoot a roll tomorrow and post results later this week.
 
$1.60 = cost per roll (24 shots) of the pseudo XP2 I bought.

Costco costs:

$1.59 = developing
$2.99 = scans to DVD: 3636 × 2432 (8.8 MP)

$5.02 = Total for developing + scans to DVD (this includes tax).

Currently, I simply don't have time to develop and scan myself. I hope to get back to it soon though 😀.

Minor point, but $1.60 + $1.59 + $2.99 = $6.18 (not including tax), not $5.02.
 
Chris101, here's an even more minor point: my previous post does not make the arithmetic claim you suggest. 😉 That said, for the sake of completeness:

$6.62 = Total for film (pseudo XP2) + developing & scans to DVD at Costco. (this includes tax)

David Hughes, I expect to have a roll shot / processed / posted this week. I plan to shoot the roll with my Bessa R3a + Nokton 40mm/f1.4.

In answer your question: from the big auction site (sold by amaan13). I have no relation to the seller.
 
Back
Top Bottom