Tri-Elmar at f/4.0?

I really tried over the weekend...

I really tried over the weekend...

Because of this thread I went out of my way to try and get the Tri-Elmar to flare this weekend, but I must report that I failed.This is one of the results. It should have exhibited internal reflections and veil. It didn't....
flare.jpg



M6 TTL, Tri-Elmar @ 28 mm @4.0
 
Last edited:
Much of my picture taking is travelling so naturally I was curious about the Trielmar and I borrowed one for a week (the second version). I found that at 28 and 35 it blocked too much of the viewfinder for my liking, and that I still needed to bring a fast lens or two for lowlight and evening shooting, so I've stuck with the prime lenses. The DOF scale on the lens is a little daunting for the first day but you get used to it. Given the nature of rangefinder photography vs SLR, at least the way I practice it, having a DOF scale is essential.
 
jaapv said:
The lens scale can never be more than a rough approximation.

Using the DOF markings for one stop (or even 2 at close range) wider than I'm shooting makes that rough approximation as smooth as a baby's bottom 😀 I've usually got my hands full using my experience to approximate the actual framing vs the framelines, and the actual metering area and subject tone, so if I had to judge the DOF mentally each time, I'm afraid I'd hardly ever get a shot off 😀
 
Back
Top Bottom