Two gears/two bodies, or what?

teleparallel

Established
Local time
7:08 PM
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
133
Hello!

I have a Bessa setup, with three lenses. But sometimes I would like to have a second body to have a second film of different kind/speed. Thing is, sometimes I think about a mechanical SLR or an advanced compact(Fuji Klasse S). The hole slr setup can maybe cost less than a Bessa body os the Klasse. At the same time, a R4M would be nice(I have the R4A). So here what I think

1 To get and SLR: I'm thinking about a Nikon FE2, since to me it has the best exposure reading, sinse I often under/over expose and I want to know how off I am from the "correct axposure". I don't mind batteries need, and the Fm3a is expensive. Advantages of getting this is, aside from my normal use as street and urban work, I would get macro and tele work. A setup of 28/35mm, 55mm, and maybe a 200/300mm is what I have in mind. The 55 is likely to be excellent for portrait also. The telephoto would be very rarely used, I think, but I do have some uses in mind. Also, in Brazil, since it's expensive to get stuff from abroad the hole setup would cost less than the bessa body. On the downside: To use as a second film setup, I'd have to carry it everywhere plus 1 or 2 lenses plus my bessa setup..

2. The klasse: it's super cool an light, but no manual focus or exposure and fixed focal length. Sometimes I miss these super compact things. Toss delta 3200 in it and never take out of my pocket.

3. The second bessa M body. I love the bessas, and wide angle, so no substitutes there. I have the perfect kit, for my normal workflow. 21mm, 35mm and 50mm all skopars. No external finders, no extra meters. I have a Passport Sling bag, that everything fits so well in it, although it's made for DSLR's with a zoom lens. A second bessa body would fit well if I and some kind of glove to one of the lenses. The other two would stay on camera. Downside is that it would be hard to get, it would cost me more(maybe the same as the Klasse) and i'd loose the 55mm micro nikkor and the telephoto.

As I said, I just go out and shoot, currently. I'm using Delta 400 at 800, so I get the extra stop on my lenses(kinda like to think as using 2.8/21 1.8/35 and 1.8/50 at 400. The most inexpensive option is to shut up and just stay the same, one camera, one film kind/speed. I'm curious about shotting super high speed film and color slide. But I never do it, because I need to follow a workflow. I also take long to end a roll, up to a week, and sometimes more. So a sencond body/kit is essential if I want to experiment more.

What do you think?
 
It gets too expensive to set up many different systems: different filter sizes, different accessories. If you really want to do tele and macro, then by all means get the Nikon. An F3 is not much more expensive than the FE2 these days, and it is very well built.

Otherwise, stick with your Bessa setup.

After getting complete systems in Leica, Nikon, Canon FL, and various medium format cameras (e.g. Rolleiflex), I think I would have been better off with just one or two different systems. Too many is too many, but I don't know which ones I want to get rid of yet. Probably none, since I like them all.
 
Before investing in a second body, just go out and shoot more; plan your photographs, do still-life images, buy 24-exposure rolls if it takes you too long to finish a roll. In other words, experiment now that you have the enthusiasm. If you fall for the allure of a second body thinking it'll lead you to "experiment" more, you'll only find out that it leads you to buy more.

Sorry if I didn't say what you wanted to hear, but the last paragraph of your own post contains the answer to your question.
 
Just a thought: If you take long to finish a roll in one camera, your agony might double if you buy another camera. 😕

Learn to work with what you have first. Save the money up for a good trip.
 
Bulk load might do the trick 😉

I am a one system guy so two bodies is what I would recommend. I found it easier to switch between same bodies as I don't feel difference in handling. I use two M2's with same film but different asa (push/pull) and different lenses.

Bodies are cheaper than lenses these days so having more bodies and less but excellent glass is what is needed IMO.

Regards,

Boris
 
Before investing in a second body, just go out and shoot more; plan your photographs, do still-life images, buy 24-exposure rolls if it takes you too long to finish a roll. In other words, experiment now that you have the enthusiasm. If you fall for the allure of a second body thinking it'll lead you to "experiment" more, you'll only find out that it leads you to buy more.

Sorry if I didn't say what you wanted to hear, but the last paragraph of your own post contains the answer to your question.

Maybe true. But to hear opinions and share experiences help to decide if I should worry about getting more diverse in photography or not. Also, someone could offer different viewpoints or insights as, already happened. So It's nice to hear them.
 
I would get a second body before a new setup. Cheaper in the long run..especially when u look at the duplication cost in terms of filters, lenses.. Plus a slr will be heavier.

W/ that being said, an slr comes into its own if u are interested in one of the following
- macro photography
- long tele work
-- by 90, I feel it is better to start thinking about going to slr, by 135 no question
- outside of the cv 50 1.1 or canon rf 50 f1.2, the old slr 50 f1.2 tend to be cheaper
- u need a zoom

Gary
 
Back
Top Bottom