Two Photos

back alley

IMAGES
Local time
10:18 AM
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
41,289
with the m8

4825046969_3852be0c56_b.jpg


with the rd1

4825045341_974c656904_b.jpg
 
interesting - looks like the high light in the first one messed up the auto WB in the M8, where as the RD-1 was fine (but didn't have to deal with the high contrast/highlight)...

the M8 had to deal with more difficult mixed lighting so it's not surprising that the auto everything wasn't up to the task...

would have been interesting if you took the same image with each, wonder if the RD-1 would handle the mixed/high contrast lighting differently/better?

apples to oranges in these images...
 
interesting - looks like the high light in the first one messed up the auto WB in the M8, where as the RD-1 was fine (but didn't have to deal with the high contrast/highlight)...

the M8 had to deal with more difficult mixed lighting so it's not surprising that the auto everything wasn't up to the task...

would have been interesting if you took the same image with each, wonder if the RD-1 would handle the mixed/high contrast lighting differently/better?

apples to oranges in these images...

actually, i cropped the window out of the rd1 shot, so same conditions.
 
The cameras have different crop factors, different metering patterns, and even though the window is cropped out in the rd1 picture, the framing is somewhat different. So there may have been more or less of the window in the rd1 shot before the crop. Thus even if both shots were with the SAME camera, the way the AWB responded might have been different in the two shots due to small changes in the balance of daylight vs. tungsten.

What would be interesting to see is the difference in the images if everything were set manually (same settings on both cameras), including the WB.
 
Also - the M8 had a couple of Firmware upgrades and at least one affected white balance. Is it possible the camera had not been updated?
 
Back
Top Bottom