Uh oh, Tri-X 400 in D76 developed with HP5+ specs!

[darkkavenger]

Yes! I'm an incorrigible troublemaker and I noticed right after developing my roll of 400TX that I used the time sheet of HP5+ ... so far the film seems ok and I can't wait for it to dry so I can see exactly what's up. As usual I took the photos using sunny f16.

I used D76 stock and souped the 400TX for 7 minutes 1/2, using the HP5+ time development sheet (I'm definitely absent-minded).

Let's cross fingers!
Max

 

[Nachkebia]

What was the temperature? Hello

Tri-X 400 D-76 stock 400 8 8 20C

http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html

 

[plexi]

That`s only 30 seconds less than the time listed Kodaks in D-76 tech sheet. Your film will come out fine.

 

[xayraa33]

I have used D 76 at 1:1 for Tri X and HP 5 and used the same dev. time & temp. for each, this last 33 years and never had any problems.

 

[Bryce]

For a photo class, I was to compare two film/ developer combinations with the same subject matter. I chose HP5 and Tri-X, both in Rodinal. Not only could I not tell any difference between the two 8x10's, my very experienced instructor couldn't either... I've come to view the two films as interchangeable.

 

[darkkavenger]

Woh, sounds good! It will sound silly but since my thermometer is broken, I develop using current room temperature, which is around 18°C i'd say. So that's allright, I checked Tri-X development tables and film came out allrightie

 

[darkkavenger]

Some results... (crappy scanner)

Kiev-2A / Helios-103 w/ UV filter & ventilated shade
Sunny f16

 

[xayraa33]

they look very good Max.
that H-103 is a fantastic lens.

 

[darkkavenger]

Thank you xayraa33! I hope to make a wet print soon, as the scanner ruins my hopes in general