kshapero
South Florida Man
How do folks feel about using 800 ISO Color film? When I use it, I mainly shoot it at 400 ISO except when I really need the higher ISO like at night. What I am losing over a 400 ISO film? Any thoughts on this? Also any preference between Fuji, Kodak Gold or Portra?
squirrel$$$bandit
Veteran
When I was shooting film, Fuji's Pro800Z was one of my absolute favorites. It might actually be my favorite color film ever. Here are some pics:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mabelsound/tags/fujipro800z/

Hot dog truck by mabel.sound, on Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mabelsound/tags/fujipro800z/

Hot dog truck by mabel.sound, on Flickr
Akiva, I'm with you in setting the EI lower than box speed; I treat Fuji Pro 800Z as a 500 speed film. As a result, I'm seeing better contrast and color in the darker areas, and a slightly richer look. It also gives me a bit of safety margin for accidental underexposure. Really nice results under mixed lighting too...
photogdave
Shops local
I just shoot everything at box speed and deal with the contrast etc. in scanning.
I always use the cheap Fuji 800.
I always use the cheap Fuji 800.
thegman
Veteran
Portra 800 is nice, it surprised me with how good the colour is, not washed out or anything. Also Portra 400 has some pretty good latitude that you can get away with it shot at higher speeds.
Photo_Smith
Well-known
I like Portra 800 rate it at box and it seems to print well, scans OK too.
Amazing how well it does in dull light, the above was shot under a canopy of trees 1/15 at ƒ3,5

Amazing how well it does in dull light, the above was shot under a canopy of trees 1/15 at ƒ3,5
RObert Budding
D'oh!
I just shoot everything at box speed and deal with the contrast etc. in scanning.
I always use the cheap Fuji 800.
It's not possible to recover under-exposed shadows in post-processing. That's why many of us bump up the exposure a bit.
kshapero
South Florida Man
thanks folks
Aristophanes
Well-known
Portra 400 shot at 800, no push in processing, but careful exposure for the shadows is what works for me.
I tried the Superia 800 and Natura 1600. Not so good. I'd rather use a flash.
I tried the Superia 800 and Natura 1600. Not so good. I'd rather use a flash.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Anyone tried Kodak Ultramax 400 color?
HoodedOne
Well-known
Most of the time I use e.i. 640 for the 800 film.
Shot with Fuji 800Z

F135-030.jpg by HoodedOne, on Flickr
I find the results from the 800Z better then the superia and portra versions.
Shot with Fuji 800Z

F135-030.jpg by HoodedOne, on Flickr
I find the results from the 800Z better then the superia and portra versions.
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
I have used fuji pro400 and was amazed by its sharpness and fine grain. Above example from pro800 tells us that it must be similar. I would give it a shot. Are those still produced?
fuji 400pro:
fuji 400pro:

bitfeng
Well-known
I don't have the pic with me. Huge grain. Too warm therefore good for fluorescent light. Seems to be about half stop faster than Xtra400.
Anyone tried Kodak Ultramax 400 color?
ray*j*gun
Veteran
Anyone tried Kodak Ultramax 400 color?
I have and I was surprised at the nice results. Natural and a little less saturation than Fuji.
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Hmm.. that Portra800 shot gives me hope for this weekend's wedding. I wonder what I can produce with it.. we'll see I'm sure.
Thanks for posting this Akiva as it's been on my mind lately.
Cheers,
Dave
Thanks for posting this Akiva as it's been on my mind lately.
Cheers,
Dave
RObert Budding
D'oh!
I don't have the pic with me. Huge grain. Too warm therefore good for fluorescent light. Seems to be about half stop faster than Xtra400.
Too warm? Sounds like a color correction problem. I've printed Pro 800Z in a color darkroom and the colors are fantastic.
Jaans
Well-known
Most of the time I use e.i. 640 for the 800 film.
Shot with Fuji 800Z
F135-030.jpg by HoodedOne, on Flickr
I find the results from the 800Z better then the superia and portra versions.
I love that photo - it is certainly a surreal shot.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
Fuji 800Z was a great film without the slight 'Disney' look of Portra IMO!

venchka
Veteran
I like 120 Portra 800 so much, if I had to pick 1 film it would be Portra 800. In the gloom, doom or rain it really shines. I will really miss it when it when my stash is gone.
Wayne
Wayne
umcelinho
Marcelo
I shot Fuji Superia 800 (slightly expired) for a whole year. Not gonna discuss here which 800 iso color film is better... portra, superia, 800z.. haven't tried all options, but Superia 800 surely delivered well.
having iso 800 as your default film allows you to shoot in pretty much any light condition. really sunny day? 1/1000 and f16. dark street at night? 1/30 and f1.4.
i've shot 2 portra 400 and pushing it 2 stops or 1.5 stop. well metered, the results are really impressive, the grain is better than the fuji superia 800 i used. really clean night shots and great tones. new portra 400 might be the most versatile film i've ever used (not that i've used too many, but still...).
superia 800

bisou by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
portra 400 @ 1250

hangman by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
having iso 800 as your default film allows you to shoot in pretty much any light condition. really sunny day? 1/1000 and f16. dark street at night? 1/30 and f1.4.
i've shot 2 portra 400 and pushing it 2 stops or 1.5 stop. well metered, the results are really impressive, the grain is better than the fuji superia 800 i used. really clean night shots and great tones. new portra 400 might be the most versatile film i've ever used (not that i've used too many, but still...).
superia 800

bisou by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
portra 400 @ 1250

hangman by Marcelo Colmenero, on Flickr
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.