Thank you all, again, for your kind comments.
It's not that I find gear discussion not worth having, I've had many questions answered by trolling the threads. I've just resisted posting most of my thoughts because they were already answered or pointless.
I think I've just matured as a photographer and I've slowed down a bit. Actually, I slowed down and then I matured. The Leica definitely helped me get to this point. I think the Leica is a great camera but I don't think it's the end-all be-all of cameras. I said in the post that I really lust after an M8, but practically speaking I'll probably get a 5D MkI and a few primes. That has entirely more to do with the kind of photography I want to do and be available for than anything to do with my love affair for the Leica.
There were a few photographers I met in Saigon who upon seeing my camera recognized it and talked of their dreams of someday owning one. Realistically speaking they probably never will as it's not a very practical or cheap camera to acquire.
A few months ago I had this basic but visceral realization that a camera is simply a light-tight box that holds a film plane and allows light to hit it for a fraction of second. It was kind of a "zen" moment for me despite how simple and obvious it sounds.
I concentrated on making connections with people even if it was only exchanging a few words in my broken Vietnamese. Some of these photos were assisted with the help of my friend who spoke better Vietnamese and his girlfriend who is bilingual. In all honesty, "hello" (the correct way as each generation is addressed differently) and "happy new year" opened more doors for me than anything else.
Being comfortable with yourself and around others helps situations like these stay fluid. Realizing that we're all human beings and that kids in Vietnam like to play just as hard as kids in the states (sometimes harder), realizing that parents love to watch their kids laugh and play, and realizing that we're all trying to make our way in this world in our own way helps a photographer move through the culture.
In some places, the idea of being an "invisible" "fly on the wall" photographer is impossible. The village we stayed in, where I made most of the black and white photos, maybe sees a westerner once or twice a year. Needless to say, we were a spectacle and drew a huge crowd. Over time, they got used to us and "protected" us. The people were not distracted by the size or kind of the camera but by our skin color and stature.
I hope and think my post will be helpful and educational. I would certainly rather travel with two bodies and a 35 Summilux and a 50 Summilux, but my budget only allowed me to take a 35 Nokton and a 50 'cron. I don' think either one of those lenses held me back in any way. If an image is a little soft, it adds to the character. Images start with light and end with sharpness and resolution.
Finally, the reason I usually don't appreciate nor read which lens/camera combo to take is because it is entirely up to the photographer. You can list your $10,000 worth of camera equipment and your $5000 get-away but it tells me nothing about you or what you hope to capture. Before leaving on my trip I knew I wanted to connect with and make photos of the people and the culture. For my style of photography, a 35 and a 50 worked really well. Others may want wider, others may want longer. Traveling is not only about experience but also education. Most people will probably over-compensate on their first few trips, I did. Over time you realize what photos you want/expect to make and pair down your gear to accommodate that.
I'm happy that my images helped illustrate the point. In the end it's not about the kind of camera or lens but about the photographer.