No. I had a trip to San Francisco from June 9-16 this year. I used the same two cameras as in my trip to Italy a few years ago. Only difference was using the Canon 50/1.4 in place of the Zeiss Sonnar 50/1.5 from the 1930’s. I did not want to risk losing the Sonnar.
Ah yes, the trip to Italy. That's the one I was thinking of.
It's almost impossible to find a 'bad' camera made by the usual companies in the last ten to fifteen years. Heck, I still shoot with my Canon 30D from 2006/2007, albeit with a new Sigma 18-35. The OG m43 cameras might be outdated and lacking in features compared with later models, but as many here have shown, they are still capable image making machines.
Still tempted to pick up that Panasonic GH1 just to be able to say I've got one. If only it was a GH2 - the GH2 was something of a watershed moment in independent low budget film making, especially with the hacks that gave it higher bitrate codecs. There was a time when lots of people had GH2s and Voigtlander lenses and posted their travel videos on Vimeo, much like YouTubers do now with cameras like the GH5, Sony A7 III and others.
I kind of miss the GH2 days of 2010-2013, there was a sense of innocence and excitement about it all. Now YouTube is full of people talking about 'cinematic b-roll' and other such trash.
The hacked GH2 with Voigtlander and Rokinon lenses was used to film a gorgeous independent movie called Upstream Color:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SilYsr_3vrA
French independent Seb Farges is/was a strong proponent of early GH cameras and vintage or manual focus lenses. This art film called Womanhattan was shot on a variety of cameras, much of it on GH1 and GH2.
https://vimeo.com/31303587
Seb shot this super cool atmospheric video using the GH2 and Voigtlander Nokton 25mm back in January 2011.
https://vimeo.com/18547872
The GH1 and GH2 had a reasonable hand grip, but were small enough that no one really paid much attention to them. The GH3 was bigger, GH4 bigger still, GH5 the size of a small DSLR and the G9 even larger.