Bob Michaels
nobody special
Filmfan: were you not trying to decide between the 40mm and 35mm Noktons? Did you do any research? I simply bought the 40mm because one came along at the right price.
I would consider the 35mm f1.4 Nokton if the wide open resolution was substantially better. Would use it primarily wide open. And I do prefer the wider field of view. I do not care anything about distortion or boken. Can deal with contrast. Only the wide open sharpness counts.
I would consider the 35mm f1.4 Nokton if the wide open resolution was substantially better. Would use it primarily wide open. And I do prefer the wider field of view. I do not care anything about distortion or boken. Can deal with contrast. Only the wide open sharpness counts.
filmfan
Well-known
Filmfan: were you not trying to decide between the 40mm and 35mm Noktons? Did you do any research? I simply bought the 40mm because one came along at the right price.
I would consider the 35mm f1.4 Nokton if the wide open resolution was substantially better. Would use it primarily wide open. And I do prefer the wider field of view. I do not care anything about distortion or boken. Can deal with contrast. Only the wide open sharpness counts.
The 40mm looks like it has better bokeh, less distortion, and is cheaper. A few of these characteristics are demonstrated very well in your shots.
Last edited:
FormulaJay
Member
It's a good lens. The only one I have.

img006 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img007 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img010 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img006 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img007 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img010 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
FormulaJay
Member
Bump for the awesome 40/1.4 SC.
I like your results from Xtol, Silent. I have only ever used HC-110 as it is so convenient and I am used to it, but I should try others.
This lens is so good I am starting to wonder if I will ever get a second lens for my bessa
. Some from yesterday.

img009 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img007 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img005 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img003-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img010-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
I like your results from Xtol, Silent. I have only ever used HC-110 as it is so convenient and I am used to it, but I should try others.
This lens is so good I am starting to wonder if I will ever get a second lens for my bessa

img009 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img007 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img005 by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img003-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img010-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
FormulaJay
Member
Gotta be more 40/1.4 users here. Some more from the SC

img019-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img022-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img034-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img019-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img022-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img034-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
silent1
Well-known
I love the tennis rackets shot Jason!
Yes HC110 is a very convenient developer and it's got almost infinite shell life. But it must be used with extra care with respect to temperature, dilution, time. I got mixed results with it. I've read around that by using higher dilution (dil H for example) those variables could be mitigated somehow. Will try when I finish my Xtol stock
Yes HC110 is a very convenient developer and it's got almost infinite shell life. But it must be used with extra care with respect to temperature, dilution, time. I got mixed results with it. I've read around that by using higher dilution (dil H for example) those variables could be mitigated somehow. Will try when I finish my Xtol stock
porktaco
Well-known
that is absolutely awesome
FormulaJay
Member
I love the tennis rackets shot Jason!
Yes HC110 is a very convenient developer and it's got almost infinite shell life. But it must be used with extra care with respect to temperature, dilution, time. I got mixed results with it. I've read around that by using higher dilution (dil H for example) those variables could be mitigated somehow. Will try when I finish my Xtol stock![]()
Thank you. I love HC-110. I always use it at dilution E and never at dilution B even when B is recommended. My setup and discipline is not the best so I like the slightly more relaxed approach I can take when using E. I have never tried H, but may some day.
FormulaJay
Member
Wow! Amazing images brbo and silent. I really like both sets a lot.
This lens is just so good. Small and beautiful.

img043-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img001-resize by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img014-resize by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
This lens is just so good. Small and beautiful.

img043-Edit by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img001-resize by Jason Rofls, on Flickr

img014-resize by Jason Rofls, on Flickr
FormulaJay
Member
FormulaJay
Member
FormulaJay
Member
silent1
Well-known
I love those last ones Jason!
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

Varese. Italy. Nokton 40f1.4 SC/ TriX D76
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

Excitement over the end of a wet spring! M2, Nokton 40mm f1.4 MC, APX 400/ FX 37? 8 min.
The color cast is due to my early scanner attempt.
Last edited:
Tom A
RFF Sponsor

Sienna, Italy. TriX in Beutler developer 1:1:8/11 min. M2/ 40f1.4 SC
In many ways the 40 mm Nokton is an almost perfect lens. It can substitute for either a 35 (a step back) - or a 50 ( a step forward). It is my preferred one camera/one lens kit - usually a M2 and Trix. I think the Sienna shot was done with a SC version, but either MC or SC works just as well.
Last edited:
xcube
Member
40 Nokton SC on Minolta CLE
Shared Humor
Excess Wine

Shared Humor

Excess Wine
Stuart John
Well-known
Here's the 40mm Nokton on my Sony NEX C3.


Stuart John
Well-known
One more...

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.