Voigtlander 50mm Color-Skopar

teleparallel

Established
Local time
8:14 PM
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
133
Hi there!

So, i want a 50mm. The final lens for my R4A. I'm used to CV's Color-Skopar, and choose them cause they're tiny, and good enough. So, what about the 2.5/50 LTM. Is it good? The build quality is comparable to the current M mount 2.5/35 and 4/21? Is it a good choice, optically? Any samples? I know it's quite small.

Are there other small lenses options? I know there is the summarit, which is supposed to be pretty good. But also a lot more money involved.
 
Definitely tiny and definitely good enough, though it has mixed reviews on the web. It is a higher contrast lens and a good pairing on the Bessa. It is a heavy/dense lens - really good to hold. A good J8 might be a good alternative, but different rendering and not as well built. Perhaps the later Canon 50/1.8 is a better comparison - similar size, weight, wider aperture.
 
4906708756_d35ed8c9f7_z.jpg


Color Skopar 50mm f2.5. Arista 400 Premium. M2 and developed in a modified Stoeckler split developer.
The 50f2.5 is a very good, compact 50 - looks and feels disconcertingly like a version 1 Summicron 35!!! Very well built - pretty well flare proof. One of the "un-sung" heroes in the VC lens line up.
 
Sold mine... Lotsa people singing about it here... Don't think I'll ever can afford one again...

Get one when you can!
 
Definitely tiny and definitely good enough, though it has mixed reviews on the web. It is a higher contrast lens and a good pairing on the Bessa. It is a heavy/dense lens - really good to hold. A good J8 might be a good alternative, but different rendering and not as well built. Perhaps the later Canon 50/1.8 is a better comparison - similar size, weight, wider aperture.

The canon is small? Will it have a focusing TAB? I Like It. The shots from the Skopar seem pretty nice.
I'm officially in search for the Skopar.(and hope for a nice price)
 
So, i want a 50mm. The final lens for my R4A. I'm used to CV's Color-Skopar, and choose them cause they're tiny, and good enough. So, what about the 2.5/50 LTM. Is it good? The build quality is comparable to the current M mount 2.5/35 and 4/21? Is it a good choice, optically? Any samples? I know it's quite small.

I like the Color Skopar 50mm f/2.5 quite a lot. It's a compact, dense, very nicely made lens. It has lovely rendering qualities. Just a few snaps:










I've used it on the M4-2, M9, and GXR quite a lot. A great lens at a very reasonable price.

I like all the modern Voigtländer Skopars, actually. I have the 21, 28, 35 and 50 ... all of them do a terrific job for very reasonable money. Their rendering reminds me of a slightly modernized Leitz Elmar.

Godfrey
 
Great pictures, Godfrey!

Here's a few snap-shots just to compare the size of the CV 50/2.5 and the Canon 50/1.8.

8208739629_d5686a8695_c.jpg


8208739909_aa9a63a871_c.jpg


8209828682_b5620ebfe3_c.jpg
 
Wow,


Super helpful! I see they're very close in size. One thing, is that the Skopar has the (small) hood on, right?

Thank you all! I guess I can't go wrong.
 
tried to sell my black copy twice here, and had no takers at lowest 419.-$ mint in box, now with the M9, it's a revelation and I'm glad I kept it as my supersmall 50, when I don't feel I need the extra stops of the summilux.

less than half the size of a summilux, same black paint finish as the black M9, with the same red enamel scale engraving, no corner falloff, ( not even on the 'picky' M9!) great modern rendering, nor too 'sonnar' nor too 'aspherical' either, somewhere in between, with beautiful perfectly round rings in the highlights, keeper
 
HU: Currently $398 BIN 3 day sale, usual $428 by Matsuiyastore here
The usual disclaimers.. no relation to the seller, caveat emptor, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom