loquax ludens
Well-known
Thanks for posting the link to that review. Strange that he didn't mention that it was the MC version he was reviewing. I can't wait to see SC version reviews.
I just noticed that the distance scale on the focusing ring is marked in meters only. I don't think I have any other lens that is marked only in meters. I'm sure most of the world is comfortable with that, but it is an inconvenience for me. I would like to have seen a dual scale.
Another review:
http://jacktaka.com/voigtlander-50mm-f15-ii
At the very bottom is a basic focus shift test.
Looks like focus is calibrated for f/2.8, though he doesn't say at what point he focused at. I'm assuming he focused in the center of the barcode. At f/1.5, it's focused closer than it is when stopped down to f/2.8.
Basically, it's behaves like the Zeiss C Sonnar. This is going to make it hard to decide which one to buy!
I just got this lens. Is there a preferred lens detection setting?
I take the Summilux 1.4 50mm asph., but my intention is only getting the EXIF Data.
At 50mm lens corrections are not so important and I normally don't shoot JPGs.
50mm Lux Asph. code is only one black field and so it's very fast and easy to code the lens ...
PS: Just a small quick and dirty SP picture from the coding
(Sorry for the bad quality)
![]()
Check this out: https://www.47-degree.com/focus-shift/leica-m-50mm-lens-comparison-part-4
Leica take notice.
These lenses look very nice. I wonder if I need another 50mm lens or not.
Sorry for a typo, the v1 version has of course 10 blades (see link)
Unfortunately I can't edit the text anymore