farlymac
PF McFarland
Great shots of your little classic, John. Never did find out how Pink's camera turned out. haven't heard from him in a while.
I finally picked up a BL last month, and as soon as I get around to going over it, I'll be making a comparison shoot with the two so that Pink's question might be answered.
PF
I finally picked up a BL last month, and as soon as I get around to going over it, I'll be making a comparison shoot with the two so that Pink's question might be answered.
PF
pinkarmy
Well-known
...Never did find out how Pink's camera turned out. haven't heard from him in a while...PF
hello everybody, i am still alive and here!
it is just that my baby girl is one and a half now and keep bumping her head + throwing things around my tiny home so i don't dare / have time to mess with my non-working-well cameras.
Kent
Finally at home...
Either lens is a good one. I could't say which one is better.
I have given my VITO B (w/ 2.8/50) as a present to a very good friend of mine (because he fell in love with the looks of that cam when he saw it).
But some days ago I have taken a completely broken VITO B with the 2.8/50 apart and adapted the lens to the NEX-mount. Another friend of mine has done the same with the 3.5/50. Perhaps we can try a comparison on digital...
I have given my VITO B (w/ 2.8/50) as a present to a very good friend of mine (because he fell in love with the looks of that cam when he saw it).
But some days ago I have taken a completely broken VITO B with the 2.8/50 apart and adapted the lens to the NEX-mount. Another friend of mine has done the same with the 3.5/50. Perhaps we can try a comparison on digital...
farlymac
PF McFarland
You'll look back on these as the joyous trimes, Pink. We'll keep thinking about you.
PF
PF
Share: