W/NW bridges

[lynnb]

Dayrell, this is wonderful. What history! Imagine, the people who've walked this path since at least the 1200s.

 

[rhl-oregon]

Hanapepe River, Kauai

 

[bobby_novatron]

Yet another type of bridge ...

Olympus OM2n, 50mm/f3.5, Portra 400

 

[ermeso3]

Pentax ME; Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 2/58; Ilford FP4 Plus

 

[02Pilot]

Leica IIIa, Summar 50/2, HP5+ in Caffenol C-H(RS):

 

[Henry]

M240/Summicron-35

 

[PhotoMat]

Bridge & Aurora

Fuji X-Pro 2 w/Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 lens

 

[brennanphotoguy]

Bridge Symmetry by Brennan McKissick, on Flickr

 

[Erik van Straten]

Leica M5, Summilux 35mm f/1.4 pre asph v1, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[Erik van Straten]

Leica III, Elmar 50mm f/3.5, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[pyeh]

Very lovely photo, Erik, and funny take on 'bridge'.

 

[Erik van Straten]

Thank you, Peter.

Leica M5, Summilux 35mm f/1.4 pre asph v1, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[Erik van Straten]

Leica M3, Summilux 35mm f/1.4 pre asph v1, Tmax400.

Erik.

 

[Dirk]

Konica FS-1; Hexanon 21mm f/4; Ilford FP4+

Konica FS-1; Hexanon 21mm f/4; Ilford FP4+

SF by FilmFlamMan, on Flickr

 

[lynnb]

Sydney Harbour Bridge from Circular Quay Station
IIIc Summicron 5cm f2 collapsible HP5+ in Fomadon LQN

 

[Scapevision]

Washington DC by Scapevision, on Flickr

 

[ermeso3]

Yashica Electro 35GS; Expired (1990s) tmax100 at 25 ASA

 

[citizen99]

Old Severn Bridge, hot hazy day by John Hancock, on Flickr

 

[williaty]

This is from my very first roll of film through the very first rangefinder I've ever owned (it arrived Tuesday). HP5+ through a Fuji GW690III processed in XTOL and scanned on a V850. There's something about this image that bothers me, but I can't figure out what it is.

Link to Flickr photo page if you want to look at it closer and tell me why it looks funky

 

[citizen99]

This is from my very first roll of film through the very first rangefinder I've ever owned (it arrived Tuesday). HP5+ through a Fuji GW690III processed in XTOL and scanned on a V850. There's something about this image that bothers me, but I can't figure out what it is.
Link to Flickr photo page if you want to look at it closer and tell me why it looks funky

It's as if there were some sort of double exposure, or over-laid other image file, in the bright, central, area. The light directionality is weird, and the perspective there doesn't seem to stack up.

Knowing more about the topography there, and the total work-flow, might be helpful.