What a huge crap his false tales on "I'm getting characters..." He's not getting characters at all! He's getting scared people because a guy almost touches their faces unexpectedly with a camera and a huge flash. "His images look different": of course they look different, as he doesn't respect people or even real scenes... He can't find real characters with real expressions as the real best photographers did and do, so he pushes people without decency, and he can't get enough internet boom for teenagers if he stays just a bit away from people... Photographs looking different, in his case, mean disturbing anyone, all people, "something will come", to abusively photograph their scared or uncomfortable or surprised faces flash washed and distorted because of proximity... He should learn a couple of lessons on respect first, and on photography as an honest act, as Winogrand used to say.
I've looked at lots of his images from different decades, and he's not an interesting photographer to me in general. Not for social content, not for intimate content, not for composition, not for creativity, not for genius or lyricism... Not even a little bit. I see lots of his images and hear him saying what can I do to do something now that I can't get enough in any other way... Seeing his shots after photographs by great photographers, is like listening to Britney Spears after a great evening with Bob Dylan, or listening to Richard Clayderman after Beethoven directed by Von Karajan. Of course Bruce Gilden gets attention from controversy, and of course there are people looking at those images, but especially at those videos, as there are millions of records by Britney Spears and Richard Clayderman being played right now.
And I don't want anyone to share this opinion. Anyone with a great opinion on those photographs and that kind of acts? Great! No problem with me! Remain there! My opinions are not in general those by the masses.
Hey, I'm not angry... 🙂
Cheers,
Juan