Wedding Surprise!

[Huss]

The files from the D750 are amazing.. they're so malleable it's beyond belief. You can really work on those files without getting artifacts. And set to 14bit lossless, there's so much detail and dynamic range, that you can do wonders with the shadows..

Yeah, I wish my M240 had the D750 sensor.

 

[Ste_S]

Wondering why your driver would have a full frame Canon dslr...

I did wonder that but didn't want to make a deal out of it on the day. The car was a 50's Oldsmobile Holiday 88, if pics of us start turning up on his website for the car I might have a word.

 

[NickTrop]

I went to a wedding a few weeks ago and the photog was using a D750. (Not bashing Canon but..) "I" wonder why anyone shoots Canon, personally (unless you have a lot invested in Canon glass...) For right now, Nikon and Sony simply are putting the best sensors in their cameras -- Nikon using Sony and Tower Jazz sensors, Sony using errr Sony sensors. You can keep Sony's (I'll spare you my thoughts on Sony cameras). Canon (and -whoa- Leica given their price) are simply lagging behind for now, an not by a little. This leaves Nikon as the only choice almost by default for pro event work. The 750 is a great choice for events. 750? Smaller, lighter, great ergonomics, fabulous sensor, scads of glass old and new to choose from -- and you don't need the extra MRs of the 8XX bodies. Who knows why they had two unrelated photos. A bit odd, yes. But maybe the main guy was a solo act and they used a friend starting out for candids as a second shooter.

BTW -- this is why I bought -two- used D600 bodies. Same output as the 750, and $6-700 on the used market (actually rated slightly higher than 750 on DXO). Used prices depressed due to the (imo) overblown "oil spot" issue. I bypassed the big auction site this time and went with the big NYC camera shops for their return policy in case there's a problem. Best deal in town to get a modern/relevant full frame camera.