B-9
Devin Bro
Really want to explore some first generation DSLRs. What’s your old favorites?
I was a Nikon shooter for many years.
I’ve shot the following.
D70
D70s
D80
D100
D300
D300s
D700
D1
D1h
D2h
D3
I think I was rather happy in the age of 5-10mp.
I would like to grab a cheap DSLR or two.
And GO!
I was a Nikon shooter for many years.
I’ve shot the following.
D70
D70s
D80
D100
D300
D300s
D700
D1
D1h
D2h
D3
I think I was rather happy in the age of 5-10mp.
I would like to grab a cheap DSLR or two.
And GO!
Solinar
Analog Preferred
I still own and use a D700, with a D300 as a back up. Both are hand me downs.
Austintatious
Well-known
I have a Nikon D50 that served me well. It's still in great shape but does not see much use because of other cameras I have now.
Independance Drummers by Carlos Yashinon, on Flickr

AndersG
Well-known
Generation 1 for me was a Canon EOS D30 (3.1 megapixels) which I bought second hand in April 2003.
Generation 2 was a Canon EOS 30D (8.2 megapixels) which I bought new in summer 2006 and I still use.
But is posting this in
Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF
the right place?
Generation 2 was a Canon EOS 30D (8.2 megapixels) which I bought new in summer 2006 and I still use.
But is posting this in
Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF
the right place?
D700 is the only one I`ve used. I`ve thought about buying a D200 as a cheap CCD camera just for fun.
taemo
eat sleep shoot
i had a lot of fun shooting with a Rebel XT when I first started getting into photgraphy.
5D too as it was the entry to digital full frame
always lusted for a 1Ds2 or 1Ds3... might consider one one of these days
5D too as it was the entry to digital full frame
always lusted for a 1Ds2 or 1Ds3... might consider one one of these days
wwfloyd
Well-known
Any of the first Canon 1D series are my faves, 12Mp or less for the non 's' models through Mk III. Have had the first 1D, and a Mk II.
The Mk IV, at 16Mp, goes beyond your stated limit, but, remains my go-to camera. I had tried a 40D and a 7D in the interim, but, they just didn't have the same feel.
The Mk IV, at 16Mp, goes beyond your stated limit, but, remains my go-to camera. I had tried a 40D and a 7D in the interim, but, they just didn't have the same feel.
ruby.monkey
Veteran
Pentax K100D. It was the first digital camera I ever owned; it was small, light, rugged, had IBIS, and supported a range of seriously sweet glass; and it was fun to shoot every time I took it out.
Only a 6mp APS-C sensor, and almost the bottom of the Pentax range when it came out, but it was an astonishingly capable little beastie.
Only a 6mp APS-C sensor, and almost the bottom of the Pentax range when it came out, but it was an astonishingly capable little beastie.
B-9
Devin Bro
Generation 1 for me was a Canon EOS D30 (3.1 megapixels) which I bought second hand in April 2003.
Generation 2 was a Canon EOS 30D (8.2 megapixels) which I bought new in summer 2006 and I still use.
But is posting this in
Rangefinderforum.com > Cameras / Gear / Photography > Classic Film RangeFinders & Other Classics > SLRs - the unRF
the right place?
I am confident this is the correct sub forum to post about Digital SLRs.
I remember handling a 30D at Ritz camera before they went belly up.
Always tempted by cheap 20Ds. Would really love to find the elusive 20Da.
narsuitus
Well-known
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I've taken some of my best shots with my D700. And I can't seem to let go of my D300, either. They are good Nikons.
AlwaysOnAuto
Well-known
I shot a lot of pictures with my CoolPix 995 before my wife asked if I should upgrade to a new camera.
I ended up falling in love with the D80 once I held/shot a friend's. It fell to hand like a well worn deerskin glove. It eventually gave way to a D7000 which has since been sent off to my sister in Australia. It was replaced by Sony mirrorless which is another story for another thread.
I ended up falling in love with the D80 once I held/shot a friend's. It fell to hand like a well worn deerskin glove. It eventually gave way to a D7000 which has since been sent off to my sister in Australia. It was replaced by Sony mirrorless which is another story for another thread.
Larry Cloetta
Veteran
Nice choice, exactly what I was going to say. Still used by some wedding photographers to this day, for the skin tones. The proprietary Super CCD sensor was something special. Nothing like it.
rumbliegeos
Well-known
I greatly enjoyed shooting a Nikon D200 until I really needed better high ISO performance. Then I sold it.
I just picked up a seldom-used D300, haven't used one since I bought one new back in the day.
$150 bargain!
I don't need new fangled modern high ISO, have other cameras for that, so it should be good for many years.
There are SOOOO many used bargains out there now of this generation, amazing what kind of performance is available for very little money.
$150 bargain!
I don't need new fangled modern high ISO, have other cameras for that, so it should be good for many years.
There are SOOOO many used bargains out there now of this generation, amazing what kind of performance is available for very little money.
Ko.Fe.
Lenses 35/21 Gears 46/20
css9450
Veteran
I have three of them, but I use them all for different needs. I still prefer my ancient D80 and its CCD sensor in sunny bright daylight, for example. My D750 excells at night photography, but its not really a Gen I camera...
Yokosuka Mike
Abstract Clarity
My first DSLR was the Sigma SD14. Damn nice camera. With the battery grip attached it fit perfectly in my hand. Later I bought the Sigma SD1 Merrill; I still have it and occasionally use it. When I retired a few years ago I gave the SD14 to my co-worker. Those are the only DSLRs I've ever owned.
All the best,
Mike
All the best,
Mike
farlymac
PF McFarland
For my first DSLR I got a Nikon D80, and liked it a lot compared to the P7700 I'd been using. So much so I got a second one as a back-up. But the back-up failed shortly after I started using it, and that's when I found out about the big flaw in that particular model. It displays a 99 code, and won't take a photo although it will go through the motions.
Seems to be a very common problem, and it can be any one of 6 things that have gone wrong with it. The only way to find out which it is is to send it in for repair. Most of the problems are fixed by replacing a major PCB or two, which can get expensive after a while, and no guarantee it will operate for very long afterwards.
So I switched to the D300s, and now have two of them. Much more rugged than the D80, and better output for less time spent post processing. I still have the good D80 just in case I get back into doing camera repairs and need something to record the process.
PF
Seems to be a very common problem, and it can be any one of 6 things that have gone wrong with it. The only way to find out which it is is to send it in for repair. Most of the problems are fixed by replacing a major PCB or two, which can get expensive after a while, and no guarantee it will operate for very long afterwards.
So I switched to the D300s, and now have two of them. Much more rugged than the D80, and better output for less time spent post processing. I still have the good D80 just in case I get back into doing camera repairs and need something to record the process.
PF
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
I had the Sony Mavica the one that took 3.5” floppy discs. At the time it was like a digital Polaroid and I used it to document the birth of my son.
Sorry! The question is about DSLRs. I had the Olympus E-1 for a few years and liked it very much for the quality. I then went into Canon for the full frame.
Sorry! The question is about DSLRs. I had the Olympus E-1 for a few years and liked it very much for the quality. I then went into Canon for the full frame.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.