What can you learn shooting film for 6 months with a Leica IIIC?

There are some great shots in there. I especially like the top one (fisherman with the concrete blocks). I don't quite see whey you stopped after 6 months though?!

S
 
This is a very inspirational story, much better that most of the stuff that I read, even at Rangefinder Forum about the new A7r, Canon 5D Mk VIIIXX, Fuji Blah blah blah....
Now, I will need to slow down on my GAS, and just use my favorite lens - Summicron 50/2 DR and just go out and shoot Tri-X for many months just like you. Gear IS NOT important. Thank you!
 
I did a variation of this for the month of november. One Camera, One Month. Any lenses any film.

I found that my composition and overall feel for how far I need to be away from a subject was greatly improved. By the end of the month my compositions were pleasing to me. I also had a chance to slow down and shoot even slower than the article above mentions. Picking up my M2 again after shooting for so long with MF was refreshing. But I feel like it ruined my chi or something because I'm not getting as good shots with it as I was with my 6x6. I also feel like I slowed down so much it takes FOREVER to get through a roll of 36.
 
You're an inspiration, congrats and great photos to back it up!! My sojourn with the IIIc lasted 6 minutes. I shall dig it up from storage and finish that roll.
 
I am a big believer of this philosophy. Had a friend just get a new lens for his digital rebel. Opened the box and played with it and decided he did not like it. I said to him, how about you actually shoot with it for like two days or something before giving up.

One thing I will say is that while we state gear does not matter, it does in one respect. You have been working on mastering a technique that accommodates the limitations of your instrument specifically a Leica IIIC with a Russian clone. This forces you into a major box. Limited shutter speeds, limited focus range, limited ability to focus, no meter, and two viewfinders.

I say this because when a beginner buys something like a Digital Rebel, it has very few limitations and in fact can make every relevant decision for the user except for composition, which I think is the hardest part of photography to master second only to properly choosing exposure (aren't these two related in many ways?). In other words, the lack of limitations with the Rebel is not instructive whereas the limitations of IIIC are instructive. That IIIC has forced you to "read light" as you state, learn equivalent exposures based on stopping down the lens inversely to opening the shutter to maintain proper exposure, and seeing with your mind's eye the composition before it happens i.e. one of the major reason a person uses scale focus because you are anticipating a moment before it happens. You can't be more ready than that....

Awesome experience.
 
Congrats! Results a.k.a. pictures are looking great!

This is how I started into photography. FED-2, Industar-26M and only one film. Back then, it was East German color slide film, ORWO if I'm not mistaken. It was the only gear and film I used for few years.

Few years ago I enjoyed Canon 5D with nothing but 50 1.8 on it for several months. As you described, something good happening to your pictures at some point.

I have IIf RD now, which I was going to sell, but decided to keep and use in summer time under Sunny 16 rule with I-22 I recently purchased. This lens is the class at its own. Better comparing to I-10 and I-50 and has character, different from Summitar, for example, but also strong.
 
One thing I will say is that while we state gear does not matter, it does in one respect. You have been working on mastering a technique that accommodates the limitations of your instrument specifically a Leica IIIC with a Russian clone. This forces you into a major box. Limited shutter speeds, limited focus range, limited ability to focus, no meter, and two viewfinders.

I say this because when a beginner buys something like a Digital Rebel, it has very few limitations and in fact can make every relevant decision for the user except for composition, which I think is the hardest part of photography to master second only to properly choosing exposure (aren't these two related in many ways?). In other words, the lack of limitations with the Rebel is not instructive whereas the limitations of IIIC are instructive. That IIIC has forced you to "read light" as you state, learn equivalent exposures based on stopping down the lens inversely to opening the shutter to maintain proper exposure, and seeing with your mind's eye the composition before it happens i.e. one of the major reason a person uses scale focus because you are anticipating a moment before it happens. You can't be more ready than that....

Absolutely. Great insight. There is a lot of psychological research now that bolsters your point: creativity is at its peak in a constrained environment.
 
P.S. about the IIIc: cutting the film leader every time is a real bummer.

So dont. I find I can load film with no leader at all quite well and short leaders tolerably with fiddling. A long leader makes it quick but isn't essential.

The trick is to have a little (1 hole) slack at the takeup spool end when loading.

And just pop it in, none of the wierd credit card or lens-off techniques.
 
Everytime a friend ask me what camera to purchase I want to say Pentax K1000 with a SMC 50 mm f/2.0.

Except no one would buy one...

Dirt cheap and easy to use.
 
Nice post. I am sort of doing the same. Bought a IIIc three months ago with a Summitar 2/50mm. Great camera! I was amazed that I could get a Leica for little more than $200. I decided to send it for a CLA and in the mean time got a M4-P which I use with the same lens. I still use my IIIc though because it is smaller and it is my choice when shooting in environments where losing or damaging it is a possibility. Adding a SBOOI 5cm viewfinder on top made it a great street shooting camera. The viewfinder is large and bright. With zone focusing framing images is very fast. Definitely a good way to fine tune composition. A IIIc or manual M makes you think. A friend of mine recently gave me a good comparison: It's like using a bolt action rifle instead of a machinegun. You make each shot count.

I am thinking of getting a X100S later, but I need to make sure I shoot it like a film camera, otherwise I am sure my images would suffer. Since I am broke now after buying the Leicas, It might be a while before than happens, and I might even reach the one year mark with the same lens!

The Summitar is nice but not as contrasty and sharp as I'd like. I think a Biogon 2.8/35mm might be my next purchase, so the M4-P might get used more than the IIIc. I'll probably carry both. Still, same style of photography, light metering, focusing, etc. I definitely want to stick with this style of photography, the images I make are definitely better now than before. I could sell the IIIc to help finance the Biogon but decided against it.

Gil.
 
I wonder what the digital equivalent would be?

In that, most people would refuse to buy a film camera knowing that developing, scanning and/or printing are part of the deal.

I guess the equivalent would be one ISO, one camera, one lens, all manual.

I have a IIIc and I have the I-22 (actually, a FED 5cm) but the camera which has made me stop and think most is a view camera. The clear separation of each of the focus and framing from the aperture and shutter settings from the triggering of the shutter, and the need to plan the whole thing well in advance, really forces you to think ahead. Rather than snap-shooting you need to "see" the scene 5-10 minutes ahead.

To the OP, I liked your straightforward write-up, and the pictures speak for themselves.
 
SNIP
I could sell the IIIc to help finance the Biogon but decided against it.

Gil.
Gil, the Jupiter-12 is the same lens design as the 35/2.8 Biogon. Despite what you have read about Soviet lens variability, the J-12's seem pretty consistent. Apart from the Zeiss brand, is there a reason for you to spend more for a Biogon rather than a J-12?

And particularly given you could keep the IIIc and afford the J12!
 
Back
Top Bottom