Pickett Wilson
Veteran
Paul, your criteria was "sharpest." Within your budget, you aren't likely to find a Leica lens that will beat a 50 Skopar for sharpness. There really isn't magic in those old Leica lenses. 🙂
Both of those Skopars are on my interest list, but I may hold out for M versions when I get an M body sometime in the next several months - I hope, I hope, I hope ...
Konica Hexanon 50mm f2.4 (retractible ltm 6element 1996)
You should look at the ads on this forum. I sold a real nice 2.8 Elmar last week for $250, well under your budget of $325. Oh yea, that was net to me.Good Elmar 2.8s are going for very high prices, from what I have seen on Ebay and elsewhere..
For corner2corner sharpness, get a planar-based design. And correct adjustment is more important than anything else. For your budget, I would get a clean Canon 50/1.8, and maybe invest into Sherry making it perfect. No Sonnar or Tessar-based lens will be able to stand up to that.
Roland.
This is in the FSU forum, you have to be careful with matching lenses to FSU bodies. I can use my Nikkor 5cm F2 on the Zorki 3M without problems because it has a thick RF cam. Lenses with a thin Cam have problems with the "finger-Style" FSU Cam follower: it slips under the cam of the lens. The Nikkor 5cm F1.4 was a problem, as was the Summarit 50/1.5.
So: some of the Canon, Nikkor, and Leica lenses will do better on a camera made to the Leica standard with a roller style RF pickup. Until then- the I61L/D has the most "snap" in my opinion.
This is kind of funny. Is there a LTM 50 that hasn't been offered up in this thread as the sharpest?