Leica Geek
Well-known
Canon f1.8 Serenar is a sweet lens. You won't regret it.
Leica Geek
Well-known
memphis said:Leica Summarit --- Even Bill Eggelston says it's his favorite lens --- great for low light, nice bokeh, and run from $150 - $400[/QUOTE
Where can I get a Summarit for that price? I'll buy one right now. I've never seen them for that low.
FrankS
Registered User
RdEoSg said:Frank, what is an Elmarski f3.5?!?!?!
It is a nickname for the Russian copies of the Elmar 50mmf3.5: they are the I-10 and I-22.
peter_n
Veteran
I have an Industar-22 made by FED and an Elmar f3.5. The Leitz lens is infinitesimally sharper and the I-22 has an excellent coating and more contrast. For $19 the I-22 is really hard to beat.
triplefinger
Well-known
I LOVE my J-3, I had a J-8 that was GREAT and yes, the summitar has an amazing quality to it.
the i-61 is a great lens but at 2.8 in a different class.
best money spent is on the J-8, plentiful, cheap and great optical characteristics.
the i-61 is a great lens but at 2.8 in a different class.
best money spent is on the J-8, plentiful, cheap and great optical characteristics.
triplefinger
Well-known
I concur on the i-22 as well as the collapsible i-50
slow, but really fantastic optically.
slow, but really fantastic optically.
peter_n said:I have an Industar-22 made by FED and an Elmar f3.5. The Leitz lens is infinitesimally sharper and the I-22 has an excellent coating and more contrast. For $19 the I-22 is really hard to beat.
triplefinger
Well-known
i had a BAD experience with the canon 50/1.2 very soft
Rico
Well-known
Wetzlar Elmar 2.8 is a lens for the ages, and very affordable.
Nokton48
Veteran
Another vote for Canon 1.2 .
Very special qualities
Very special qualities
NickTrop
Veteran
The 7 element 5 group f1.4 on the Yashica Lynx 14e IC (45mm, tad wider than 50)
The 1.7/45mm on the Yashica GSN.
Best lenses for the money in town. And they come with a pretty darned good camera attached.
The 1.7/45mm on the Yashica GSN.
Best lenses for the money in town. And they come with a pretty darned good camera attached.
surlysimon
Established
I would put in votes for the canon 1.8 and the Industar 61 bothe very nice, the Canon has a very good feel in use and is very rugged.
jja
Well-known
I do not have experience with the Canon or Russian lenses, but here's what I've used:
50/2 Summicron (latest)
50/2.8 Elmar (v. 1)
50/2 M-Hexanon
50/1.4 Summilux pre-asph
Of these, the best value lens, and the one that will never require "upgrading," is the M-Hexanon.
50/2 Summicron (latest)
50/2.8 Elmar (v. 1)
50/2 M-Hexanon
50/1.4 Summilux pre-asph
Of these, the best value lens, and the one that will never require "upgrading," is the M-Hexanon.
jja
Well-known
Oops, how could I forget, Nikon 50/1.4 in LTM, a lens with a lot of character! If you are patient, you might even find one for under $300 on e-bay.
Jeremy Z
Well-known
Well, maybe I'll chip in from the non Leica owning guys, to try to keep things real.
Get a modern Leica lens, with multicoating. The Leica glass is the best reason to own a Leica camera, IMO. There's no good reason to spend money on more than one 50mm lens, if there are other lenses you don't have. (just my humble opinion)
Get a modern Leica lens, with multicoating. The Leica glass is the best reason to own a Leica camera, IMO. There's no good reason to spend money on more than one 50mm lens, if there are other lenses you don't have. (just my humble opinion)
RdEoSg
Well-known
Thanks Frank! That's a part of rangefinders I haven't ventured into yet, but I look forward to trying!
I just thought the name was funny. I am always Polishifying words much to my Polish fiancee's dismay!
I just thought the name was funny. I am always Polishifying words much to my Polish fiancee's dismay!
FrankS
Registered User
Jeremy Z said:Well, maybe I'll chip in from the non Leica owning guys, to try to keep things real.
Get a modern Leica lens, with multicoating. The Leica glass is the best reason to own a Leica camera, IMO. There's no good reason to spend money on more than one 50mm lens, if there are other lenses you don't have. (just my humble opinion)
OMG, I'm feeling dizzy, and there's a tightness in my chest! I....
We are clearly at a odds, Jeremy!
Ororaro
Well-known
Best? And Cheap? And beautiful?
The Summarit 5cm without a single doubt. It's an outstanding lens.
The Summarit 5cm without a single doubt. It's an outstanding lens.
FrankS said:OMG, I'm feeling dizzy, and there's a tightness in my chest! I....
We are clearly at a odds, Jeremy!
It is ok Frank, just more for us.
Germanica
Member
Summitar would be my choice of lens if good quality onesit were available and relatively cheap, they are not, when cheap they have fogging, fungus, miserable mechanics.... when good overall quality they are as expensive as a top class Summicron.
You can get a crummy one and have it cla'd but this probably might not resolve all the optical problems and the purchase price of the lens together with the cla.... well it would be expensive too.
One thing however, I see where the Russian and Japanese advice comes from, some of them are good lenses, few are very good lenses, none however match Leica glass in my experience anyway.
Get a first version Elmar in good condition when on a budget and in want of a good lens.
Otherwise go for a summicron, nothing wrong with that, define your styles and go with the version that meets your style.
In my (limited) optics, you buy a Leica for the glass, this makes it all worth it. Have to ask yourself too what you are going to shoot, B&W, Colour or slide .... and then the amount of contrast wanted/needed/liked and do you like your images sharp? Do you want to shoot with limited DOF etc. once you answer these questions for yourself you can choose the appropriate (leica) lens.
Member x might find lens Y an excellent choice, but also might have a totally different shooting style than you have .... In this case the lens will be a terrific lens, for him/her ... but in this case not for you....
You can get a crummy one and have it cla'd but this probably might not resolve all the optical problems and the purchase price of the lens together with the cla.... well it would be expensive too.
One thing however, I see where the Russian and Japanese advice comes from, some of them are good lenses, few are very good lenses, none however match Leica glass in my experience anyway.
Get a first version Elmar in good condition when on a budget and in want of a good lens.
Otherwise go for a summicron, nothing wrong with that, define your styles and go with the version that meets your style.
In my (limited) optics, you buy a Leica for the glass, this makes it all worth it. Have to ask yourself too what you are going to shoot, B&W, Colour or slide .... and then the amount of contrast wanted/needed/liked and do you like your images sharp? Do you want to shoot with limited DOF etc. once you answer these questions for yourself you can choose the appropriate (leica) lens.
Member x might find lens Y an excellent choice, but also might have a totally different shooting style than you have .... In this case the lens will be a terrific lens, for him/her ... but in this case not for you....
Last edited:
mattmills
madman (w/ camera)
another vote for the canon 1.2, and I'll also second the voightlander 2.5 skopar- until it was stolen, this was my favourite walk around-lens.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.