Bingley
Veteran
All of the above recommendations are correct. What sort of "look" are you seeking? A Nocti, Summi, Elmar or Sonnar are all brilliant lenses, but don't all excel in the same way.
If I had just gotten an M3, and money was no object, I would look for a clean collapsible Summicron, and a Zeiss C-Sonnar 50/1.5. I could cover all the kinds of photos I like to take with those two lenses. YMMV.
If I had just gotten an M3, and money was no object, I would look for a clean collapsible Summicron, and a Zeiss C-Sonnar 50/1.5. I could cover all the kinds of photos I like to take with those two lenses. YMMV.
JohnLundy
Member
+5 50mm DR 'cron. Here is one on my M6. However, it is typically on my M3 DS.

New Gordys Strap! by MikeScarduzio, on Flickr

New Gordys Strap! by MikeScarduzio, on Flickr
David Hughes
David Hughes
Hi,
The answer must be "several" lenses; otherwise, why use the M3 (or M2 or M4 or etc, etc)?
Regards, David
The answer must be "several" lenses; otherwise, why use the M3 (or M2 or M4 or etc, etc)?
Regards, David
Sureño
Established
thanks guys, very very interesting replies.
sc_rufctr
Leica nuts
If "money no problem" my choice would be a Noctilux f1.0. That's the dream lens for lot of people.
Livesteamer
Well-known
The 50mm 2.8 Elmar is a wonderful, under appreciated lens. Very compact, makes lovely images.
I also have a 1955 M3 with a 2005 50mm Summilux asph. 50 years of Leica's best.
Joe
I also have a 1955 M3 with a 2005 50mm Summilux asph. 50 years of Leica's best.
Joe
inzite
Well-known
original black paint m3 + 50 1.2 noctilux
preferably both brassed 
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
An unconventional suggestion: a Voigtlander Nokton (1950s vintage) in Leica mount.
JohnLundy
Member
If "money no problem" my choice would be a Noctilux f1.0. That's the dream lens for lot of people.
I agree that it is a good choice as well. See mine below.

Leica M3 + Noctilux f1 E58 by MikeScarduzio, on Flickr
Leica M3 DS with the Noctilux 50mm f1 E58 (v1).
Shot w/ iPhone 4
Vickko
Veteran
f1 Noctilux for the M5
f1.2 Noctilux for the M3.

Vick
f1.2 Noctilux for the M3.
Vick
Sureño
Established
beautiful John I wish I had that combo but I would have to buy Swarosvky shoes to my girlfriend if I do that to compensate 
leicamshooter
Established
I've used them all... from the collapsible radioactive summicron, to the current production one. I've also used the Nikkor 1.4 LTM and the Canon 1.4 LTM, as well as the plannar Contax G 45/2. In the end, I feel that the current version summicron works best for my M3.


rulnacco
Well-known
You might look for one of the goggled 35 lenses--they came in three flavours, Summilux, Summicron and Summaron. I've got the latter, and while of course the view is not quite as nice as, say, a 50 without goggles--it is just a bit darker and there is a little distortion--you get the huge viewfinder, the complete and easy-to-see framelines (the goggles convert the 35 mm field of view to fill the 50 framelines), and what to me is really a more "normal" focal length. Plus it's superbly sharp.
The Summaron is still a bit of a bargain, even though prices have risen significantly the last couple of years. The goggled versions are less popular though, and so can often be found at reasonable prices. And it looks wicked cool on the front of an M3!
I not only use mine on the M3, but also on my recently-acquired M6, where it works just as well. As mind-bending as used 35 Summicron prices are nowadays, I'm sure it will see good service for some time to come.
The Summaron is still a bit of a bargain, even though prices have risen significantly the last couple of years. The goggled versions are less popular though, and so can often be found at reasonable prices. And it looks wicked cool on the front of an M3!
I not only use mine on the M3, but also on my recently-acquired M6, where it works just as well. As mind-bending as used 35 Summicron prices are nowadays, I'm sure it will see good service for some time to come.
thirtyfivefifty
Noctilust survivor
50mm DR Summicron! (... or any 50mm)
Vics
Veteran
Amen to that! I had the DR and loved the optic, but hated the weight. Since I had a Collapsible 'cron as well, I traded the DR for a 35 Summaron 2.8 w/goggles. The rigid-same-as-DR would be the ticket!i'd vote for the regular summicron rigid. same optics as the DR without the extra weight. Close focusing is nice though.
Vics
Veteran
"The Summaron is still a bit of a bargain, even though prices have risen significantly the last couple of years. The goggled versions are less popular though, and so can often be found at reasonable prices. And it looks wicked cool on the front of an M3!"
Amen to THAT. Makes the M3 a total Buck Rogers rig. And the photos are very beautiful!
Amen to THAT. Makes the M3 a total Buck Rogers rig. And the photos are very beautiful!
WJJ3
Well-known
my vote goes for the goggled summaron (2.8) as well. Im guessing price IS a factor, and this is the most reasonably priced lens, in the most useful focal length for your M3. I got a 90 (rokkor, CLE) to compliment mine, and have a blast shooting this set up...
you can see some of the results I have gotten with this set up here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/50955665@N07/
Its not a great sample of the quality you can get with these lenses since I was processing my own film with Diafine, and scanning with a crappy scanner. But I think you can get the idea...
you can see some of the results I have gotten with this set up here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/50955665@N07/
Its not a great sample of the quality you can get with these lenses since I was processing my own film with Diafine, and scanning with a crappy scanner. But I think you can get the idea...
WJJ3
Well-known
and yeah, its really cool looking!
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=173815&ppuser=44309
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=173815&ppuser=44309
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.