What looks more like Reala, 160s or 160c?

[wilonstott]

Simple.

I know 160s is less contrasty and 160c is more contrasty.

Which subs better for the dearly departed Reala?

Examples are welcome. I love looking at photographs.


Cheers.

 

[Costo Kim]

NPC/160c is close to Reala and I believe it's better for landscapes/architecture/macro/etc
NPS/160s is totally different: 'calm' with soft rendering - this film is better for portraits

 

[not_in_good_order]

Here are a couple of examples. The subject matter and camera/lens differ, but you can get a general idea of the characteristics of each film.

Here is a 160s image:



And here is a Reala image:

 

[wilonstott]

Thanks for the help guys--I'll probably go with 160c.

 

[JayGannon]

I didint even know.
Reala is still available in large quantities from Hans O Mann in Germany, time to stock up!

 

[wilonstott]

I didint even know.
Reala is still available in large quantities from Hans O Mann in Germany, time to stock up!

Yea I noticed it is available on Adorama as well--not on B&H though.

 

[jpberger]

I hope I wrong but I think fuji killed 160c too, as well as 160s in 35mm so this is all a bit moot in the long term 🙁

 

[Fotohuis]

Fuji will come with a new 160 NS film.

 

[wilonstott]

I hope I wrong but I think fuji killed 160c too, as well as 160s in 35mm so this is all a bit moot in the long term 🙁

Crap! Really?

 

[Pherdinand]

160C ...
but... is reala discontinued??

 

[David_Manning]

Here's a 160S example.

I prefer it for scanning, I think...I can always increase contrast later.