Frida
Established
Mostly other wedding photographers.
Can you explain further?
He's saying that a person with a wide ranging knowledge and understanding of the world (history, literature, art, religion, other cultures, philosophy, etc.) will be better equipped to see the world and to tell a story through photography.
Well, I understood what he meant, but wanted to have a longer conversation regarding his point, because I see too many disregard looking at other's photography because they feel it'll seep into their own. It's almost impossible to shield yourself from outside influences (whether photography or something else)... and I doubt anyone has ever been influenced only by photography. However, to ignore the history of the genre you work in isn't really condusive to learning either.
all excellent choices. I think you would like Masaki Kobayashi, you should find The Human Condition or better yet Harakiri.
Harakiri is my favorite live action movie of all time and is not to be missed by a fan of black and white films. One of the best shot movies of all time, easily IMO. Skip Miike's remake though.
Coming from rock music (playing and listening), I did my first serious photographs in the '70s, shooting at that time big groups like UFO or ELP. Just as a fan, for fun. The equipment was likely crap (120 film P&S) but I have a few keepers (only prints, the negatives are lost, sadly). Back then it wasn't difficult to gain access very close.1) So, what or who influences your photography (past and present)?
It started just for fun and it sill is.2) Why do you do it?
Just looking at good forums (like this one) and expositions.3) Who / what are you looking at photography wise right now (new or old)?
Well, I understood what he meant, but wanted to have a longer conversation regarding his point, because I see too many disregard looking at other's photography because they feel it'll seep into their own.
Currently, Chris Crawford. I'm constantly amazed at his ability to capture beauty and emotion in the things we see every day.
I still admire Andrej Kertesz, who seemed to see through God's own eyes.
I fully agree with you.
This (the bolded statement above) is a misunderstanding of how our mind works. Our mind creates by synthesis, using pre-stored imagery (can be voice, sound, mood, texture, smell, anything that our sensory perception can record and store in memory) and combining it with the scenes in front of us.
The more we look at other people's pictures, the richer our memory banks become, and thus it'll make us more effective when creating a new photographs with the surrounding that is available to us.
...
1) So, what or who influences your photography (past and present)?
2) Why do you do it?
3) Who / what are you looking at photography wise right now (new or old)?
...
1) So, what or who influences your photography (past and present)?
2) Why do you do it?
3) Who / what are you looking at photography wise right now (new or old
😀😀😀😀😀😀 Thanks!
. . . . Our mind creates by synthesis, using pre-stored imagery (can be voice, sound, mood, texture, smell, anything that our sensory perception can record and store in memory) and combining it with the scenes in front of us.
The more we look at other people's pictures, the richer our memory banks become, and thus it'll make us more effective when creating a new photographs with the surrounding that is available to us.
Wasn't that just the purple paper sequence?. . . Not that I did not want to be David Hemmings, like everyone who saw Blowup.