RJBender
RFF Sponsoring Member
Bryan Lee said:
The funny thing if you google < bertram photo > and then count down to number 8. 😀
I get a yacht named the Marlin Monroe. It doesn't have a trolling motor on it. I don't get it. 😕
R.J.
Bryan Lee said:
The funny thing if you google < bertram photo > and then count down to number 8. 😀
RJBender said:I get a yacht named the Marlin Monroe. It doesn't have a trolling motor on it. I don't get it. 😕
R.J.
Try Sullvian Library-News, before yacht thing.copake_ham said:Apparently it depends on where you are googling from as to what number 8 is. Here in US I had to go to the second page and a couple down from there to find the reference.
I won't comment on the referred site or subject.
But it does go to show the global reach of RFF that we are all googling and getting different results.
Gentlemen (I note that none of the Ladies will even bother with this thread), how about we put aside the nazi thing? It is not relevant and far too inflammatory.
Please? :angel:
Taipei-metro said:Try Sullvian Library-News, before yacht thing.
Brother Bertram B. ...Photo exhibition...
Is he a man of God?
Socke said:Which will bring you to http://www.viernheim.de/kirchenundkjg.0.html if you're using google with a german localized version of mozilla 🙂
bobofish said:A tremendously wise strategy would be for Zeiss to develop "digital ready" lenses for dslr's.
Mazurka said:Sadly, my Dec 20 suspicion is largely confirmed: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=186031#post186031
Then I guess it's possible that the ZF range could be "digital ready" -- the Contax versions (especially the wideangles) slightly tweaked perhaps? This could also explain why the teasers feature only 50 and 85mm lenses, both of which don't have light fall-off problems with APS-C sized digital sensors. Wideangles will probably be further down the line because of the required development.
copake_ham said:Perhaps it is all just now starting to come together?
Maybe the ZF lenses are not intended to "replace" certain Nikkors but to "succeed" them in at certain focal lengths?
Problem with that analysis is that Nikon is apparently continuing production of the standard manual primes.
Or are they?
halabar said:So, this would seem to open the door for the Zeiss ZF lenses?.. No?....
Bertram2 said:The Zeiss idea would not make sense without the Nikon decisions, both suck profit from this strategy and so I think there has been a kinda coordination for all this.
bertram
The other reason for buying Zeiss ZF instead of Nikon is much simpler:
Nikon just announced it was discontinuing the manufacture of manual focus lenses.
RJBender said:
source: http://www.zeiss.de/C12567A8003B8B6F/GraphikTitelIntern/KVHomepageZF06gross/$File/06_gross.jpg
Yes, it seems that way now. Why would Nikon let Zeiss use their F6 and FM camera bodies to promote the new ZF lenses? Perhaps Nikon had to make their announcement first and that is why the Zeiss announcement was postponed. 😕
R.J.
CLN: And why did Zeiss decide on the Nikon F mount?
Dr. Scherle: We had three main reasons:
1) Nikon has, for half a century, earned a great reputation with professional photographers. They began with copies of Zeiss Ikon Contax rangefinder cameras right after the World War II. In the 1960's they introduced their famous Nikon F SLR and with this legendary camera and its successors Nikon established the standard for professional 35 mm SLR's worldwide.