Dear Keith,
Ah: a business opportunity at the airport: Honest Abdul's Used Cameras...
Cheers,
R.
Dear Brian,According to Reuters, this not just a US issue:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-airlines-electronics-idUKKBN16S1TM
Dear Keith,And used laptops and used tablets... Definitely a good business model, especially if you can acquire your inventory from other passengers' checked luggage.
Would this have anything to do with the fact that more and more, the English can be astonishingly servile?
Cheers,
R.
Here are the cities...
The ban was revealed on Monday in statements from Royal Jordanian Airlines and the official news agency of Saudi Arabia. It will apply to non-stop flights to the US from 10 international airports serving the cities of Cairo in Egypt; Amman in Jordan; Kuwait City in Kuwait; Casablanca in Morocco; Doha in Qatar; Riyadh and Jeddah in Saudi Arabia; Istanbul in Turkey; and Abu Dhabi and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, according to a US official.
If you're not traveling to these places you'll be okay...lets not get all Chicken Little about this...
Dear Brian,Dear Roger,
Dunno.
Possibly it could be because shared intelligence with the US has thrown up a new security loophole that needs plugging.
Wouldn't you think there would be at least some overlap between the travel ban and device ban countries? Yet there is not:
Device ban: Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Morocco, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey
Travel ban: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
If laptops are a threat, why would potential terrorists from the (now overruled) travel ban countries be allowed to carry them?
This is confusing. But what isn't these days?
John
So you are concerned that those from the 8 countries, the list that Obama put together, won't be able to bring their electronic devices?
Dear Phil,
Alternatively:
A: Go somewhere else
and/or
B: Don't go back...
It's worked for me since 2006, the last time I was in the USA.
Cheers,
R.
Nah. Occam's Razor: authoritarian nutter. Explains everything else, including the GO HOME OR FACE ARREST vans (Treese's idea).
Cheers,
R.
Yeah but not to anybody who can remember past eight years... nine years ago we had a much more embarrassing president than the guy who's been more or less cleaning up after his mess for the past eight. :angel:
But getting back on topic, all of these bans are more or less stupid and pointless posturing, and only seem to be implemented to convince the astonishingly simpleminded among the public that something "is being done". Nobody ever blew anything up with a bottle of shampoo, and yet we can't take a bottle of shampoo on.
Once on my way back from a vintage car show they inspected a small wrench set I had with me, taking the largest wrench and measuring it to make sure it wasn't dangerous. What a load of nonsense. It's all so mind mindbogglingly stupid.