What's so good about nikon F2?

loneranger

Well-known
Local time
9:57 AM
Joined
Feb 14, 2006
Messages
427
Hi, I am looking for a reliable all mechanical film slr, so someone suggested I look at nikon f2. I head to eBay and see prices all over the map, from $200 to $4000! So what is up with that, what is a good price, and why are some so expensive? Btw, I really like the black ones with the very tiny prisms, which seem to be higher priced. Is this just collector madness, or are they really that good?
 
I had mine new in 1973 and still have it . I bought it with the small finder ( DE-1 ) , but after a year traded the finder for a metered one . I do regret that a lot . I particularly like the F2 with DE-1 or the F2AS ( electronic finder with leds , very sensitive ) .

Also consider a FM2n , also fully mechanical at a smaller size and very reliable , but no 100 % viewfinder coverage as the F-series .
 
What's so good about nikon F2?

Perfection

NikonF2.jpg
 
Nothing, if you want a perfectly reliable mechanical Nikon SLR get a Nikon FM2n instead. It's built just as good (you can take it to war) and it has 1/4000 shutter.
 
An F2 is like a tank, you see 100% of the frame, and if you attach the motor drive you get great stability for shooting with slower speeds. It really feels in hand like a great tool, similar to shooting with an M3.
 
the plain prism commands a higher price for a reason.

the metered head is purely functional; that is to say that it looks like a big growth on top of your camera but it allowed you to have in camera metering. at the time, this was fine. these days though, you can get any number of cameras with more elegant solutions; so what makes the Nikon F2 a good camera today (build quality, simplicity, etc) has caused a shift in what people are really looking for.

the F2 is a big camera.

the fm series are fine but they have small finders and poor coverage compared to some Olympus and Pentax offerings. I'd stick with the real pro offerings as they are so cheap these days that it doesnt make much of a big difference.

my picks for basic, reliable, inexpensive cameras:
big cameras: Nikon F, Canon new F1
small cameras: Olympus OM-1, Pentax LX, Konica Autoreflex T3

why do you need an SLR? if you want to do macro, I would recommend Olympus since the stuff other than lenses (bellows, ring flashes, true macro lenses, screens, etc.) are plentiful and not too expensive.

if you're interested in spending some real money I would point you towards Nikon and the ZF lenses.

p.s. isnt one of the big selling points of an SLR accurate framing? fm2 has 93% coverage...
 
So why are these priced so high, when almost all other film slr can be had for a lot less. What is a fair price for a silver one with the small prism? The lowest price I can find is around $700. It looks like the larger metered prism ones are much cheaper, so is the small prism so rare?
 
Thanks , that is very helpful,


the plain prism commands a higher price for a reason.

the metered head is purely functional; that is to say that it looks like a big growth on top of your camera but it allowed you to have in camera metering. at the time, this was fine. these days though, you can get any number of cameras with more elegant solutions; so what makes the Nikon F2 a good camera today (build quality, simplicity, etc) has caused a shift in what people are really looking for.

the F2 is a big camera.

the fm series are fine but they have small finders and poor coverage compared to some Olympus and Pentax offerings. I'd stick with the real pro offerings as they are so cheap these days that it doesnt make much of a big difference.

my picks for basic, reliable, inexpensive cameras:
big cameras: Nikon F, Canon new F1
small cameras: Olympus OM-1, Pentax LX, Konica Autoreflex T3

why do you need an SLR? if you want to do macro, I would recommend Olympus since the stuff other than lenses (bellows, ring flashes, true macro lenses, screens, etc.) are plentiful and not too expensive.

if you're interested in spending some real money I would point you towards Nikon and the ZF lenses.

p.s. isnt one of the big selling points of an SLR accurate framing? fm2 has 93% coverage...
 
p.s. isnt one of the big selling points of an SLR accurate framing? fm2 has 93% coverage...

So has just about every other SLR except for the Nikon F to F6 and Canon F1👎. And so have slides. Even worse, so had the enlargers at most newspaper or agency labs - when using a F series Nikon as a press photographer in fixed employment, you essentially had to learn to leave some margin, or learn not to mind getting cropped by the lab assistants and editors. I knew a photographer or two that could not stand that and used Leicas only because they have no 100% finder...
 
So why are these priced so high, when almost all other film slr can be had for a lot less. What is a fair price for a silver one with the small prism? The lowest price I can find is around $700. It looks like the larger metered prism ones are much cheaper, so is the small prism so rare?

It's the BS created by the collectors.. I have three Nikon F's from the Jurassic era all with plain prisms because they were cheap! I did not want to pay some $60 difference then for the FTn prism while having a pocket lightmeter. Today that stupid plain prism makes more than the body.. Buy the one with Photomic prism if you want an F2, the rest is nonsense..
 
It's the BS created by the collectors...

I don't think that's entirely true. IMO, it's a combination of rarity plus general desirability of the simple, no-frills machine that appeals to the photography enthusiast, which at this point, you pretty much have to be to even be bothered shooting film. I wish I had one myself.
 
So has just about every other SLR except for the Nikon F to F6 and Canon F1👎. And so have slides. Even worse, so had the enlargers at most newspaper or agency labs - when using a F series Nikon as a press photographer in fixed employment, you essentially had to learn to leave some margin, or learn not to mind getting cropped by the lab assistants and editors. I knew a photographer or two that could not stand that and used Leicas only because they have no 100% finder...

everything I listed is north of 95% the Canon, Olympus and Pentax are all about 97%, and the Nikon is 100%

honestly I dont understand the point of your post.
 
Or look for a Nikkormat FT2.

Recently in a fit of nostalgia I bought a Nikon FTn Photomic.
It kept locking up. Disappointed I returned it for refund.

I consoled myself by purchasing a clean Nikkormat FT2 for $30.
I'm impressed. It's built like a classic Nikon F or F2 - very solid.
I like it far more than the FM and FM2n bodies I once owned.

The meter was jumpy but just exercising the shutter speed dial solved that.
It uses 1.5V silver batteries and works great with pre-AI Nikkor lenses.

Chris
 
As mentioned earlier, the viewfinder is excellent on the F2, and the shutter is distinct and superbly crisp.
 
Back
Top Bottom