Leica LTM what's this barnack?

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

splitimageview

coincidence rangefinder
Staff member
Local time
2:54 PM
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
9,796
#176030 has speeds to 1000, no lugs, and M-style vulcanite. Serial number indicates it's a IIIa, but shouldn't it have lugs?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6095.jpg
    IMG_6095.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_6096.jpg
    IMG_6096.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 0
Yes I agree it should have lugs.

Oh well, that's what makes collecting these jewels interesting.

My IIIa doesn't have the covers over the shutter curtains!
 
A possibility that occurs to me is that it might be a factory upgrade of an earlier camera. In that era Leitz offered a service whereby an earlier camera could have certain upgrades performed to make it function like a later model. And sometimes this involved changes to body parts (like top plates) and I believe, serial numbers.

For example, I used to own a lovely 111a that had been upgraded in the 1950s to give it the flash sync characteristics of a 111f, including not only a flash sync port but also an adjustable collar around the shutter button, like the 111f models, to change the flash discharge time for different flash bulbs. (Some bulbs were slower burning and so had to be triggered earlier so they were at full strength by the time the shutter opened). This is but one example of the sort of quite extensive changes Leitz very kindly made available (at a price) to their clients.
 
I believe 187718 s a Leica III.

My IIIa has 1/1000 exposure available. This distinguishes the III from the IIIa.

Check here:

https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmnum.htm

187718 is indeed a III, both by the serial number, and because it lacks 1/1000. And 176030 shows up as a IIIa in the listings. No problem there--nothing unusual about Leitz running a batch of an earlier model with serial numbers higher than an later one. But why no lugs? I thought about the possibility of an upgrade from a II, but then it ought to have the serial number of a II. I don't think Leitz changed the serial number when converting to a later model. They forgot to put the lugs on? Nahh. Someone ordered it special without lugs? But why would they? Too silly.

I think it must be cobbled together from parts, with a IIIa top plate put onto a II body.
 
A lot can happen to a camera in 80 years and being a modular construction it's not difficult to see how. And there was a period from 1939 onwards when parts were just not available from Germany and so were salvaged from other damaged cameras or even the shop window dummies. Add to that people who like tinkering with cameras and the result could be anything....

Regards, David
 
Sometimes features were not implemented right from the start of a new camera series. Some new features were introduced gradually.
Same thing concerning the disappearance of the screws holding the top cover to the body cover in the If/IIf/IIIf series. We haven't pinned down from which point on this happened.
 
Could there have been a period of transition where both the II and III cameras were made at the same time? Until parts got used up? Perhaps some left over parts found there way onto what became III cameras?

Just a thought. After a cup of coffee my brain works a little, very little though!
 
Good point, it's logical that existing batches of parts were used up first.

There is some variation between the shape of the frame around the VF amongst the III/IIIa top covers as well as I recall.
 
Thanks everyone. This history of these cameras is very interesting.

Is there any significance to the vulcanite? Other Barnacks I've seen thru the IIIc have different material, up until the IIIf where it became the vulcanite like the original M3.

I suppose this camera was serviced at some point and got new covering and/or shell.

It's the oldest Barnack I have yet appears to be in perfect operating order in every way. Most that come my way need service in one way or another but not this one.
 
Just maybe it was specially ordered with no lugs for ease in jacket pocket toting ?

Or maybe the body shell was replaced at one time, with one from a Leica II model and the tech just drilled it for the slow speed dial?
 
Back
Top Bottom