What's your favorite Nikon RF camera?
Correction lenses were available for the SP as well, but they are rare. It is also possible to easily hack Nikon EM correction lenses to fit the Nikon SP.
As far as I know, the S2 is the only Nikon rangefinder camera for which viewfinder correction lenses are available. These are for me very important.
Erik.
Correction lenses were available for the SP as well, but they are rare. It is also possible to easily hack Nikon EM correction lenses to fit the Nikon SP.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
My favorite Nikon RF-camera is the S2, but what is your favorite lens for a Nikon RF?
Mine is the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 wich is opically NOT for 100% the same as the Color Skopar 50mm f/2.5 for LTM. In any case is my copy much sharper. Also sharper than any 50mm Summicron or any other 50mm lens I've used. It is awesome.
NikonS2/SSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110.
Erik.
Mine is the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 wich is opically NOT for 100% the same as the Color Skopar 50mm f/2.5 for LTM. In any case is my copy much sharper. Also sharper than any 50mm Summicron or any other 50mm lens I've used. It is awesome.
NikonS2/SSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110.
Erik.

hap
Well-known
My favorite Nikon RF-camera is the S2, but what is your favorite lens for a Nikon RF?
Mine is the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 wich is opically NOT for 100% the same as the Color Skopar 50mm f/2.5 for LTM. In any case is my copy much sharper. Also sharper than any 50mm Summicron or any other 50mm lens I've used.
NikonS2/SSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110.
Erik.
Richard Haw's review
https://richardhaw.com/2019/06/29/r...dd,with the slow maximum aperture to match it.
Pál_K
Cameras. I has it.
I really like the many photos you've posted on this site, Erik.
This one surprised me, since I didn't fully realize the scale until I saw the young man seated at the lower right of the photo. The many geometrical shapes really make the image. Nice.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Thank you, Pál. It is an old shipyard in Amsterdam, NDSM.
About the lens, the S Skopar:
Not the slightest barrelvault or pincushion distortion and then that sharpness, incredible!
Wonderful tonality, very easy to print.
NikonS2/SSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110
Erik.
About the lens, the S Skopar:
Not the slightest barrelvault or pincushion distortion and then that sharpness, incredible!
Wonderful tonality, very easy to print.
NikonS2/SSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110
Erik.

Erik van Straten
Veteran
Haw has apologized to me for making a mistake about the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 distortion.
Erik.
Hi-- Was this statement the mistake you're referring to?Haw has apologized to me for making a mistake about the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 distortion.
Erik.
"It can exhibit a pincushion-type distortion"
If so, his illustration shows a similar small amount of pincushion distortion that mine (a Leica thread-mount version) shows. I understand you are particular about distortion and observe that your own copy of the lens does not show it... Sample variation?
WeirdHaw has apologized to me for making a mistake about the S Skopar 50mm f/2.5 distortion.
Hi-- Was this statement the mistake you're referring to?
"It can exhibit a pincushion-type distortion"
If so, his illustration shows a similar small amount of pincushion distortion that mine (a Leica thread-mount version) shows. I understand you are particular about distortion and observe that your own copy of the lens does not show it... Sample variation?
Sample variations are caused by assembly factors such as rangefinder calibration differences resulting in slightly differing focus points or various amounts of decentering resulting in minor differences in sharpness across the field but the distortion a lens exhibits is a factor of the optical design so there should be no difference between lenses.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
I can't remember exactly how it was, (may be on YouTube) but he was repairing a Nikon S2 and he showed a picture made with the camera and the 50mm f/2.5 Voigtländer lens for Contax/Nikon. On the picture was something horribly curved and he said this was due to the distortion of the 50mm f/2.5 Voigtländer lens. I showed him a picture I took on wich it was clear that the lens only distorts very, very minor (much and much less than the Nikkor H Auto 50mm f/2) so he has apologized to me for making a mistake about the S Skopar 50mm f / 2.5 distortion.
I have both the LTM and the Nikon S versions of the lens. They are different, the Nikon version has a different coating (different colour). I will make soon some comparative photos for I have the feeling that the Nikon S version has even less distortion than the LTM version.
Erik.
This was the picture:
LeicaM2/ColorSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110
(Of course a bad example because every line on this picture is curved as this railwaystation is build on a railway arch, but some lines on the bottom are pretty straight.)
I have both the LTM and the Nikon S versions of the lens. They are different, the Nikon version has a different coating (different colour). I will make soon some comparative photos for I have the feeling that the Nikon S version has even less distortion than the LTM version.
Erik.
This was the picture:
LeicaM2/ColorSkopar50mmf/2.5/TMY400/AdoxMCC110
(Of course a bad example because every line on this picture is curved as this railwaystation is build on a railway arch, but some lines on the bottom are pretty straight.)

so he has apologized to me for making a mistake about the S Skopar 50mm f / 2.5 distortion.
Yet his blog post about the lens still states:
"It can exhibit a pincushion-type distortion but it’s not too different from the Nikkor-H.C 5cm f/2 but it looks uglier to my eyes for some reasons. I’ll admit that I expected better from this lens since it’s a recent optical design but you will have to live with it."
I will make soon comparative photos for I have the feeling that the Nikon S version has even less distortion than the LTM version.
You think your lens doesn't have any distortion. Others with the lens think it has some pin-cushion distortion. No big deal. The lens takes fine photos either way. Comparative photos seem like a waste of time. Maybe just continue to take photos normally and not worry about it?
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Yet his blog post about the lens still states
Yes, but it was not his blog post, it was on YouTube if my old memory still works correctly.
His writings on repair are brilliant, btw.
Erik.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
NikonS2/AllBlackNikkor50mmf/1.4/TMY400/IlfordMGFB
Erik.
Erik.

campagnolo
Member
Right now my S3 is equipped with the 10.5cm Nikkor-P. It is slowly growing to be my favorite set up. This was my first time shooting BW (HP5), developing, and scanning as well.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Waiting on an S3 2000.
keytarjunkie
no longer addicted
Waiting on an S3 2000.
Welcome to the club Akiva. It seems there has been a slight increase in activity in Nikon RF users, or at least in this board, in the past year. Hoping that trend continues!
campagnolo
Member
Welcome to the club Akiva. It seems there has been a slight increase in activity in Nikon RF users, or at least in this board, in the past year. Hoping that trend continues!
Agreed, we need more posters! But I guess due to the camera itself, finding more Nikon RF shooters is just a rare sighting.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Just got the S3 2000. Roll of film going in tonight.

campagnolo
Member
Just got the S3 2000. Roll of film going in tonight.
Happy shooting!
jpuffer
Newbie
S3: titanium shutter or cloth?
S3: titanium shutter or cloth?
My first post here to say that I have wanted a Nikon RF since I was in high school in the 50s. I bought my first Nikon, a Nikkormat FT when I was in the army stationed in Japan and later moved up to a Nikon Photomic (love that word) FTn and then various digitals to now with my D810. So I finally bit the bullet some 50 years later and bought a beautiful S3 from Japan and am shooting and processing various color film and then scanning. So my question is how does one know if their S3 has the cloth or titanium shutter? I've done a lot of Googling and come up empty. BTW its serial number is 6307039.
S3: titanium shutter or cloth?
My first post here to say that I have wanted a Nikon RF since I was in high school in the 50s. I bought my first Nikon, a Nikkormat FT when I was in the army stationed in Japan and later moved up to a Nikon Photomic (love that word) FTn and then various digitals to now with my D810. So I finally bit the bullet some 50 years later and bought a beautiful S3 from Japan and am shooting and processing various color film and then scanning. So my question is how does one know if their S3 has the cloth or titanium shutter? I've done a lot of Googling and come up empty. BTW its serial number is 6307039.
keytarjunkie
no longer addicted
My first post here to say that I have wanted a Nikon RF since I was in high school in the 50s. I bought my first Nikon, a Nikkormat FT when I was in the army stationed in Japan and later moved up to a Nikon Photomic (love that word) FTn and then various digitals to now with my D810. So I finally bit the bullet some 50 years later and bought a beautiful S3 from Japan and am shooting and processing various color film and then scanning. So my question is how does one know if their S3 has the cloth or titanium shutter? I've done a lot of Googling and come up empty. BTW its serial number is 6307039.
Hey, welcome. The S3 only came with a cloth shutter from the factory, but can be modified with a titanium shutter transplant from the F or later SP. A titanium shutter has a little stamped pattern on it, like this F2, while a cloth shutter looks more like...cloth. You probably have a cloth shutter.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.