gfspencer
gfspencer
Am I the only one who will admit to using Auto ISO? 
b.espahbod
Optophile
160 in general but sometimes a bit of nostalgic grains are needed then 640
greggebhardt
Well-known
My favorite ISO is the lowest that I can get by with!
I am not interested in making my images look film like!
For me Film is Dead! I did it for over 30 years and while it has it's "look", I have moved on to digital and embrace it!
I am not interested in making my images look film like!
For me Film is Dead! I did it for over 30 years and while it has it's "look", I have moved on to digital and embrace it!
S
Simon Larbalestier
Guest
320 or 640, 1250 if necessary.
Art8.2
Newbie
160 for outdoor.......for indoor and B+W it depends.........
Grober
Well-known
Logically I know that 160 should deliver the best results but when I shoot @ 320, I'm more in synch with that part of my brain that shot s-o-o-o much film @ 400 over the years. Seems more natural to me...
-g
-g
napoleonesq
Established
I'm a street documentary photographer shooting hand held and 90 percent of the time converting my images later to B+W.
I find that 640 works great for that purpose, yielding the most film-like look after post-processing. judge for yourself:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aglimpseoftheworld/467244979/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aglimpseoftheworld/458867696/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/aglimpseoftheworld/460044174/
When I am shooting with color in mind, I try for lower ISOs, depending on the lighting. I find that M8 color looks markedly better at lower ISOs.
Great photos...what postprocessing do you use for the BW?
ampguy
Veteran
640, unless outside in bright light. Interesting, but the RD1 at 800 is less noisy.
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
I leave it at Auto ISO. I just want to get the shot and don't care too much about the noise.
Jim Evidon
Jim
Whatever works?
If Capa took the soldier photo with a Phase One, and post-processed it with HDR and Alien Skin from the future, would the image be any better?
pontificating on minutae == missing the point
The image would have been better, but the composition and the drama of the moment would have been the same. Capa could have shot with a box Brownie or the forthcoming Leica S2 and his pictures still would have been immortal. Consider the D Day landing shot; film ruined in salt water and everything out of focus, but he got the moment just right. There will never be another like him.
hef
Member
160
160
I use 160 most often and try not to go over 1250 in dim light...
160
I use 160 most often and try not to go over 1250 in dim light...
benmacphoto
Well-known
I use 160 almost all of the time, occasionally I've had to use 320 and 640. They were not bad but I'll use 160 over the other ISO settings.
ulrikft
Established
Whatever allows me not to go below 1/125th. I do mostly street photography so I use Auto Iso up to 640. As I like to shoot wide open, most of my day pictures are at 160 which I find wonderful with the M8.
I don't like the "1250" and find the 1600 R-D1 grain way better, similar to the 640 M8 grain.
2500 is unusable IMO unless you have to, that is below 1/8th.
You should really put a RSS on your blawg, so i can follow it
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.