Where are the feet?

A long time ago a photographer friend and I used to shoot a lot of weddings and took pictures of people for other occasions and we always took a full length vertical shots of them and made sure we didn't cut off the feet. If the picture was of a number of people we would shoot a horizontal shot but again always included the feet. On occasions shooting more candid pictures the feet were cut off because pictures were often taken much closer up. To this day I do the same thing and if I have to cut off the feet because of space limitations or shooting distance, it always takes me awhile to ponder where to cut off the legs? If I shoot closer I usually cut people off a little below the waist. I think most photographers in the business did the same. To me cutting people off looks more like a snapshot than a more purposeful picture that people may want taken of themselves. Just my outlook on this. Jim

Thanks for your input from the field.
 
Were the ladies in the OP more concerned about the feet, or about the $600 in new shoes that the feet were in that they bought for the shoot?

That I own an M8 and a 5D is the most extreme form of luxury in my circle of friends. 600$ for a pair of shoes is not something we talk about.
 
Back
Top Bottom