van_d
Established
Perhaps. But he is known and that counts for something. I don't like Bruce Gilden, but you can't discount his fame.
Craig Semetko doesn't seem to have much of an internet following. He has little more out there than the greats. Weeks you could argue is more internet fame than anything, the anti-Eric Kim, I guess.
There's also quite a bit of lesser known stuff coming from LA from photographers who might one day be well regarded and "famous."
Craig Semetko doesn't seem to have much of an internet following. He has little more out there than the greats. Weeks you could argue is more internet fame than anything, the anti-Eric Kim, I guess.
There's also quite a bit of lesser known stuff coming from LA from photographers who might one day be well regarded and "famous."
back alley
IMAGES
...for a number of reasons...do i want to know?
Carterofmars
Well-known
Street photography will always be as long as there is a man with camera and a street full of people.
maddoc
... likes film again.
I would ask the question slightly different... Today; where is the audience for the Winogrands, the Joel Meyerowitz, the Elliott Erwitts ? Where are the iconic "Life" and "Time" where the photos of the famous were published that made them famous ?
These days we have blogs, and "street-photography workshops" held by guys who are good at self-marketing by writing a blog ...
Carterofmars
Well-known
They're staring at their IPhone screens. Well, at least we can enjoy each others photographs.
Spot on... and it makes you wonder if those who think they are better really know how to see.
