raid
Dad Photographer
The 28/3.5 may be sharper. The 28/2.8 will not make you another Winogrand.
For you Canon 28mm f/3.5 LTM users, does the front of the lens rotate when you focus it?
If it does then that means it needs a round shade. If it doesn't it can use a round or rectangular shade.
Ditto for the Canon 28mm f/2.8 LTM.
Thanks!
Neither lens rotates when focusing; but neither lens really needs a shade, since the front element is well-recessed into the barrel. (Canon never made a hood for these lenses.)
Thanks! I usually have a yellow or skylight filter on my lenses and I want to use a shade to prevent reflections off of the filter. If I get the 28mm f/3.5 I'll have SK Grimes make a custom stepping ring from 34mm to 39mm and use the Leica 12526 shade.
I did this to my 50mm f/1.8 Canon lens (40mm to 39mm) and SK Grimes cut a groove into the ring so that the Leica shade 12585 clips on perfectly.
For a lens with a 34mm filter ring, you could just use a Leitz SOOGZ adapter (clamp-on A36 to E39 adapter), which already has a groove milled in it for Leica A42 clip-on shades.
However, while a SOOGZ and 39mm filter doesn't cause any problems, adding an IROOA hood does result in hard vignetting in the corners (I just tried this combo with my Canon 28/3.5 on an M240). I don't have a 12526 anymore to try but, like the IROOA, it's intended for a 35mm lens' field of view. You might do better with a 12504 vented shade (alas, I no longer have one of those either).
The best/coolest hood to use, IMO, would be a Leitz SOOHN A36 clamp-on hood for the 28/6.3 Hektor (I used to have one, but foolishly sold it) with 34mm screw-in filters on your lens. (Alternatively, you could use the rectangular SOOBK clamp-on shade for the 28/5.6 Summaron, but that would run you 2x the cost of the Canon lens.)
I was the other person who bid on that lens. You should be thanking me for being too preoccupied with being on vacation to bid it up. 😉
I've been looking for a 28 to replace my Snapshot Skopar, which is a bit too contrasty for my liking. If it turns out not to be everything you'd hoped, let me know.
The 28mm Summaron is what I'd consider a collector's lens and not a user's lens. If I were to spend $1k I'd get the Minolta-G 28mm or a Nikkor 28mm in LTM.
I'll look into the MS Optical 28 triplet.
Thanks!
The 28mm f/3.5 Canon arrived yesterday afternoon. It looks pretty good - has a few specs inside it. Overall I'm pleased.
It's off to Don Goldberg for a CLA along with an 85mm f/2 Serenar.