Which 35mm lens to get ?

Streetmaniac

Member
Local time
11:20 PM
Joined
Nov 29, 2025
Messages
15
Location
Germany
Hello to the forum, i am looking for a 35mm m lens with the following characterestics:
1. Small and light but usable
2. With a focus tab
3. Focus till 0.7m( not some strange 0.5 or so)
4. Sharp and characterful
5. Price around 1000

What would you get ?
 
Hello to the forum, i am looking for a 35mm m lens with the following characterestics:
1. Small and light but usable
2. With a focus tab
3. Focus till 0.7m( not some strange 0.5 or so)
4. Sharp and characterful
5. Price around 1000

What would you get ?
You're talking about a rangefinder lens I assume. M mount? Screw mount?

There will be no shortage of opinions, I think! (In fact, if you research past threads here, I think this question has been asked and answered several times before....)
 
Keeping the price down and the quality high, (& a Leica lens as first choice) i'd suggest the Summaron 35mm f 2.8 .
Many others are fine performers from different companies.... Canon LTM & adapter, modern Voigtlander, Light Lens Lab 8 E.....and others
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by character? Crazy bokeh, gradual tonal shift? Do you want aspherical sharpness and contrast, but that's not usually associated with character. Film or digital, color or B&W?

From my experience ...

Light Lens Lab 35mm Summicron, 8 element replica -- sharper than the original. I like the original better, but this one is well made, with a strong nod to the original, with more modern sharpness and contrast. Sometimes too much sharpness but that's a personal preference.

Voightlander 35mm f/1.4 Nokton II SC or MC -- Useable wide open, characterful bokeh. Really very creative lens. Not overly sharp but not unsharp either. The SC shines with B&W.

I've heard great things about the 35mm Summaron, and I have one with a repair tech getting cleaned, but more of a tone monster from what I understand, not so much sharpness. In the last year I've recently been drawn to the single coated circa 60's Leica optics.

I shoot B&W film only now days, and think the asphericals are too sharp and contrast, but that's just my flavor preference. If that's what you want, consider a Voigtlander Ultron -- clean and sharp but wouldn't call it character.

Type 2/3 35/2 Summicron -- plenty sharp but not overly so, well made, lots of contrast. In its own way it has character; a transition period between old and modern Leica.

Might consider Mandler 35 which is a Chinese made 4th Summicron. Wouldn't call it a character lens, but clean and sharp.
 
There's a long thread about the Mandler homage to the Leica Summicron v4 King of Bokeh, only $348 USD brand new as long as there is stock.

Voigtlander makes any number of compact 35s including the Nokton 35mm f1.4, Skopar 35mm f2.5, Ultron 35mm f2.

Zeiss has the excellent Biogon 35mm f2.8. Their f2 version is larger, though.
 
What do you mean by character? Crazy bokeh, gradual tonal shift? Do you want aspherical sharpness and contrast, but that's not usually associated with character. Film or digital, color or B&W?

From my experience ...

Light Lens Lab 35mm Summicron, 8 element replica -- sharper than the original. I like the original better, but this one is well made, with a strong nod to the original, with more modern sharpness and contrast. Sometimes too much sharpness but that's a personal preference.

Voightlander 35mm f/1.4 Nokton II SC or MC -- Useable wide open, characterful bokeh. Really very creative lens. Not overly sharp but not unsharp either. The SC shines with B&W.

I've heard great things about the 35mm Summaron, and I have one with a repair tech getting cleaned, but more of a tone monster from what I understand, not so much sharpness. In the last year I've recently been drawn to the single coated circa 60's Leica optics.

I shoot B&W film only now days, and think the asphericals are too sharp and contrast, but that's just my flavor preference. If that's what you want, consider a Voigtlander Ultron -- clean and sharp but wouldn't call it character.

Type 2/3 35/2 Summicron -- plenty sharp but not overly so, well made, lots of contrast. In its own way it has character; a transition period between old and modern Leica.

Might consider Mandler 35 which is a Chinese made 4th Summicron. Wouldn't call it a character lens, but clean and sharp.
Steve, he used the word characteristics.....not character....
 
Steve, he used the word characteristics.....not character....
Under "4" he listed "Sharp and characterful" as a criteria. Now a lot of the sharp, contrasty aspherical type lenses aren't considered character lenses. Ergo, my questions to him, what he means by character, because as you see from this thread alone, people attribute different meanings to the concept.
 
I recently got a Voigtlander 35 2.5 in M mount. The ii version. I find this lens to be PERFECT for ergonomics of handling. The focus tab and aperture tab are placed well apart, and where you can depend on them. Awesome. If you don’t need 1.4, then you will not find a better handling lens ATMO.
 
Under "4" he listed "Sharp and characterful" as a criteria. Now a lot of the sharp, contrasty aspherical type lenses aren't considered character lenses. Ergo, my questions to him, what he means by character, because as you see from this thread alone, people attribute different meanings to the concept.
i wonder if it's a internet translation from german 'charactervoll' ?
I see your point....all our camera-nerd nuances may not be implied.....
 
With character and sharpness i meant something that renders like the leica 28mm f2 asph. This lens has to me the best rendering of all and sadly the 35mm asph of the same generations is very different.. if i could swallow the focal length id save for the 28mm but i live in Germany and dont need 28mm so often.
 
If you want something with some degree of character in that price range, I would be inclined to suggest you might consider the Leica 35mm f2.8 Summaron. It comes in goggled and non-goggled versions. The video link below is based on using the goggled version on a Leica M but of course it is optically identical to the non-goggled one (which would be my choice if I were to bu one). I believe it is around the $1000 mark in US currency. (I have been a long-time user of the 35mm f3.5 version of this lens and I like it a lot BTW, but have often thought of getting its f2.8 brother because it is regarded as being the better lens. (as well as half a stop faster)



If you are not absolutely fixed on getting a Leica lens, the recent Light Lens Lab 35mm f2, which is closely based on the 8 element version of the Leica Summicron 35mm f2 seems to attract great reviews by all who have tried it. It has a similar price to the above and is specifically touted as a character lens.



and here


Both of the above lenses seem to be well regarded in every review I have read or seen.
 
If you don’t find the right Leica lens, and you have to cave in to something better, a lovely lens is the ZM (Zeiss) 35mm f2.8 C Biogon. There’s a long thread on it here. Lots of fans of this lens. Zeiss colours are beautiful.
 

Thread viewers

Back
Top Bottom