elmer3.5
Well-known
Hi, me and a friend we´re trying to figure it out which would be the best 28mm f2.8 lens for an M8!
I won´t consider thou the Leica Aspherical 28mm Elmarit , because it´s completely out of budget!
So your votes and opinons are most welcome!
Thanks!
I won´t consider thou the Leica Aspherical 28mm Elmarit , because it´s completely out of budget!
So your votes and opinons are most welcome!
Thanks!
Last edited:
kzphoto
Well-known
28mm Elmarit ASPH is really highly rated. As is the Konica Hexanon 28mm f/2.8
RobertB
Established
I vote for the 28 biogon ZM. I'm really impressed with the pictures coming out of my copy.
The ZM's are build well and are easy to use.
Might want to look here (the only 28 biogon review I know
http://kenrockwell.com/zeiss/zm/28mm-f28.htm
The ZM's are build well and are easy to use.
Might want to look here (the only 28 biogon review I know
http://kenrockwell.com/zeiss/zm/28mm-f28.htm
Bill Harrison
Member
28mm
28mm
Don't have one, so I can't REALLY recommend. I hear the summicron ASPH is terrific, but it's not on your short list....
28mm
Don't have one, so I can't REALLY recommend. I hear the summicron ASPH is terrific, but it's not on your short list....
Krosya
Konicaze
Hex is the best - great glass, great built - better than ZM, and usually has a good price to boot.
Last edited:
kzphoto
Well-known
If the G 28mm 2.8 is a conversion, my only concern would be that there aren't any aperture clicks. If you could get the same optics in a different housing I'd own one. Best 28 I've ever used.
sprokitt
Established
I own the pre-asph 28 elmarit, and its a good lens. Can't complain.
However, from what I've seen of the ZM (if its anything like my old G 28), I think its a better choice for the $$.
However, from what I've seen of the ZM (if its anything like my old G 28), I think its a better choice for the $$.
amateriat
We're all light!
I'll go with what I know: the M-Hex 28 was the first of the three lenses I bought for my current setup (got it with my first Hex RF) eight years ago, and I've loved it from the start. Its quality shows all around.
- Barrett
- Barrett
alan davus
Well-known
Hex is the best - great glass, great built - better than ZM, and usually has a good price to boot.
Ditto!!!!!
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
I'm voting for the Hexanon as well. Wonderful lens.
...Mike
...Mike
crist
Crist
Hexanon!!!
Gary Sandhu
Well-known
I have the hexanon and now bought a v4 pre-asph (in addition to a 28/3.5 voigtlander, g-rokkor) and plan on getting around to a shoot-out on my M8 an MP. So far, I really like the tab in the v4
kermaier
Well-known
I'm a fan of the M-Rokkor. It's as sharp and contrasty as I need. Very well built (better than the M-Hex, IMO, though lighter materials). Wonderful ergonomics, with nice focusing tab and solid aperture ring, and the vented bayonet shade reverses on the lens for storage. And it's the smallest 28/2.8 apart from the Canon in LTM - think 40.5mm filters.
Yeah, yeah -- there's the uncertainty of getting one not plagued with the typical white spots problem, but I had mine cleaned by FocalPoint and it's great now.
::Ari
Yeah, yeah -- there's the uncertainty of getting one not plagued with the typical white spots problem, but I had mine cleaned by FocalPoint and it's great now.
::Ari
emraphoto
Veteran
any of the vc 28's.
ampguy
Veteran
I'd go with a good example of a Canon 28/2.8 if size is important for your needs. Otherwise the Hexanon, while larger than the Canon would be ideal.
Krosya
Konicaze
I'm a fan of the M-Rokkor. It's as sharp and contrasty as I need. Very well built (better than the M-Hex, IMO, though lighter materials). Wonderful ergonomics, with nice focusing tab and solid aperture ring, and the vented bayonet shade reverses on the lens for storage. And it's the smallest 28/2.8 apart from the Canon in LTM - think 40.5mm filters.
Yeah, yeah -- there's the uncertainty of getting one not plagued with the typical white spots problem, but I had mine cleaned by FocalPoint and it's great now.
::Ari
Which frame lines does it bring up on M-body? as far as better built than Hex - I'd be surprised at that. While I have never had Rokkor 28, I did have several 40mm's and while they are built well - I would never say that they were better built than Hexanons.
amateriat
We're all light!
The M-Rokkors are excellent lenses indeed (I'd shot with them a bit, and worked a lot more with the better of Minolta's AF lenses for about a decade), but Konica's lenses are every inch their equal, at least.I'm a fan of the M-Rokkor. It's as sharp and contrasty as I need. Very well built (better than the M-Hex, IMO, though lighter materials). Wonderful ergonomics, with nice focusing tab and solid aperture ring, and the vented bayonet shade reverses on the lens for storage. And it's the smallest 28/2.8 apart from the Canon in LTM - think 40.5mm filters.
There's the rub, then. Hence my pick of the M-Hexanon.Yeah, yeah -- there's the uncertainty of getting one not plagued with the typical white spots problem, but I had mine cleaned by FocalPoint and it's great now.
- Barrett
ampguy
Veteran
framelines
framelines
The CLE Rokkor 28s will bring up the 35/135 framelines on a regular M body.
framelines
The CLE Rokkor 28s will bring up the 35/135 framelines on a regular M body.
Which frame lines does it bring up on M-body? as far as better built than Hex - I'd be surprised at that. While I have never had Rokkor 28, I did have several 40mm's and while they are built well - I would never say that they were better built than Hexanons.
f16sunshine
Moderator
I can't imagine a 28 performing better than the Hexanon. There are smaller and faster Yes.... as for IQ and built quality it's as good as can be IMHO.
Rico
Well-known
Pre-ASPH Elmarit-M covers a lot of territory: four versions across four decades. Based on my research, the v3 was most appealing: medium contrast, sharp enough, nice bokeh, great DOF scale. The v4 is smaller and has a modern rendition, but that loopy DOF scale is a turn-off. I finally settled on the ASPH.
Still attractive to me (but not cheap) is the rare Minolta 28 LTM as it reappeared from the TC-1 P&S.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.