oleg C
Established
Thomas, your words are sweet tunes to my years! I'm waiting for my new a la cart MP with 0,85 VF. Just hope I've made the right decision.. 😕
Which M has the best VF?
- Thread starter time
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 66
- Views 858
Thomas, your words are sweet tunes to my years! I'm waiting for my new a la cart MP with 0,85 VF. Just hope I've made the right decision.. 😕
fotomeow
name under my name
This poll was incomplete: the iiif wasnt listed as an option (?!?!). From what I understand, modifications are availabe for M series VFs at Sherry Ks and DAG for aboot $225 bucks. The modifications includes the MP VF patch for no flare, increased contrast, and maybe MP brightlines too.
I've heard all the great things about the M3, but it does not have 35mm lines. Perhaps they could be added? but you may have to decrease magnification? and that may be the deal breaker?
I've heard all the great things about the M3, but it does not have 35mm lines. Perhaps they could be added? but you may have to decrease magnification? and that may be the deal breaker?
time
Established
oleg C
Established
Yeah, wiil do, can't wait...
morback
Martin N. Hinze
Hi DNG,
for what it's worth I always feel underwhelmed when I try Leicas. Maybe too much expectation. I was tempted by a M5 recently and checked one out yesterday.
The viewfinder is dim, the frames are dim, and the information at the bottom of the frame is not very visible. Nice uncluttered framelines though.
I had the same impression when deciding between M6 & ZI. Too cluttered, too dim, too tight: not impressed by the M6 either.
kdemas
Enjoy Life.
Martin- You must have had a dud M5 because the viewfinder is really quite good. The only time the meter is tough to read is in true pitch black conditions.
Next to the M3 the M5 has my fav 50mm view, combined with a terrific meter.
Kent
PS- the beauty in all these responses is that everyone has their own style and preferences, there's no "right answer" 🙂
Next to the M3 the M5 has my fav 50mm view, combined with a terrific meter.
Kent
PS- the beauty in all these responses is that everyone has their own style and preferences, there's no "right answer" 🙂
Pablito
coco frío
Nuff said.
mfogiel
Veteran
I think the answers to this poll are confused. On the basis of A) brightness and B) RELATIVE magnification, Zeiss Ikon is two steps ahead of anything else. What it means, is that the 0.74x ZI viewfinder will let you comfortably use 28,35,50 and 85mm frames (the 28mm gets a bit tight if you wear glasses). What's more, the relative SIZE of each frame will be bigger than the same frame in a 0.72x Leica, AND the image will be at least a stop brighter (and there is no flare). It also has single 35mm and 50mm frames, plus the RF accuracy is only second to M3. In practice, it has a Leica 0.58x and 0.72x viewfinders covered in one. Frankly, there is nothing better than this around for general shooting. I wear glasses, so for me the M3 was hardly usable, and for a dedicated 50mm body I use an 0.85x M7. For wider lenses, obviously the Bessa R4 wins hands down. If Zeiss made different magnifications bodies, they would make Leicas and Bessas redundant.
Gary Sandhu
Well-known
I changed my mind. The Leica SBOOI is the best thing I've looked through -- just got it a few days ago.
wgerrard
Veteran
I think this highlights the immense variations in eyeglasses. I wear glasses -- a strong prescription with compressed polycarbonate progressive lenses -- and had no difficulties using an M3's viewfinder. Yes, I had to be careful about positioning my eye to see the 50mm framelines sharply. I have never used a camera that didn't require careful eye placement. I attribute that to the progressive lenses, because sharpness of vision varies from one location on the lens to the next.
Others with different prescriptions, different lenses and different frames will have different experiences. I spoke with my ophthalmologist about this. Things that make a big difference include the distance the eyeglass lenses sit from the eyes, the distance the camera's finder glass is from the eyeglass lense, the path(s) of light through the finder, light reflected back from the photographer's face, and, of course, the actual problems the eyeglasses are intended to correct. It's down to try it and see.
AJS Lamb
Established
The M3, by a country mile. It's a jewel.
robbeiflex
Well-known
What about my Rollei 35RF? It's based on the CV Bessa R2 and it really is great for glasses wearers. I'm not upset that it's not on the poll, but wanted to say that anyone who wears glasses and is considering a CV Bessa should check it out. It has an odd 40, 50, 80 frameline combo but that may be useful to some, so far I only use it for the 50.
Gib
Newbie
Looking through an M3 VF makes subjects virtually the same size as they are without the VF. Makes it easy to frame and shoot.
M2 has cleanest frame lines.
--Gib
M2 has cleanest frame lines.
--Gib
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
M2. Then M4.
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
Personally, I often go "Leica M3, Elmar-M 50mm f2.8, Tri-X, scan on Nikon 5000ES and print on Hahnemuhle Photo Rag".
I do like my M3 finder - but I also like the finder of the Hexar RF. Which is more versatile. I suspect I'd like a Leica 0.58 finder and a ZI finder, though I've never looked. If I shot more wide stuff I'd probably want a Bessa R4. But I'm happy enough for now with my M3 and Hexar RFs.
There's nowhere I can vote for that, though.
...Mike
picker77
Established
I only own an M2 and a Zeiss, but have also eyeballed a few others. The Zeiss blows them all away, with my M2 being second and M3's a close third.
ernstk
Retro Renaissance
Not with a 35mm lens. Not by a long way.
M2 is way superior when using a wide angle lens.
Ernst
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
Since I wear eyeglasses, i voted for the 0.58 finder--but with reservations. My reservation is that I wish they had not downsized the framelines to make them agree with the closest focus distance. The ideal thing would be to have the .58 MP framelines--28/35/50/75/90--sized for a medium distance, rather than favoring a distance of 0.7M. So if I didn't need a .58 finder, I would vote for the M4P, the early one with full sized framelines.
sepiareverb
genius and moron
Why isn't the M6 on the list? I thought that was the best Leica. No fancy pants stuff, just a real camera.
DavidC
Established
leica vf weakness
leica vf weakness
Because of conservative design philosophies, Leica never really mastered the eye relief problem. For eyeglass wearers, they still have to squint to see the whole picture. Also their diopter correction lenses are woefully indadequate covering only a small spectrum. Zeiss on the other hand has been able to break thru with not only bright VF's but covering a wider angle of view. So, viewfinders were not and are not Leica's forte.
leica vf weakness
Because of conservative design philosophies, Leica never really mastered the eye relief problem. For eyeglass wearers, they still have to squint to see the whole picture. Also their diopter correction lenses are woefully indadequate covering only a small spectrum. Zeiss on the other hand has been able to break thru with not only bright VF's but covering a wider angle of view. So, viewfinders were not and are not Leica's forte.
Similar threads
