Mael
Established
Hello.
I intend to buy a WA for my S3 millenium. Which would you recommend in terms of sharpness from the Voigtlander line ? I will be shooting slides essentially.
Thanks !
I intend to buy a WA for my S3 millenium. Which would you recommend in terms of sharpness from the Voigtlander line ? I will be shooting slides essentially.
Thanks !
They are both excellent extremely sharp lenses. I had both but kept the 21/4 because there isn't much chance of me ever owning the Nikkor 21/4 in S-mount.
dexdog
Veteran
I concur with Jon, both lenses are very sharp. I had both, and kept the 21 because the 25 was too close to a 28mm in field of view. Can't really go wrong either way, though
Jon, you could always grit your teeth and put the Contax 21 on your nikons...
. The Zeiss lens works well on my SP
Jon, you could always grit your teeth and put the Contax 21 on your nikons...
BillBingham2
Registered User
I have CV 25/4 in S mount because I loved it on my Bessa L, it never came off. I did not get the 21 in LTM for two reasons.
First I had a 21/2.8 Elmarit and never really liked it. It was part of a three lens set for my M6 (21/35/90) but distored too much. Second I had a CV 15/4.5 which felt just right for a super wide.
While I love the lens for me there is not enough difference between the 25 and my 35 to bring her out often. On my S2 my triplet was a 25/50/105. I'm keeping my eyes open for a Nikon F to S adapter which would allow me to pick up a CV 15 SL lens and use it on my S3-2000. Perhaps I should think about the 21mm focal lenght more as it's hard to find the adapter.
Hope I was able to add a bit of confusion.
B2 (;->
First I had a 21/2.8 Elmarit and never really liked it. It was part of a three lens set for my M6 (21/35/90) but distored too much. Second I had a CV 15/4.5 which felt just right for a super wide.
While I love the lens for me there is not enough difference between the 25 and my 35 to bring her out often. On my S2 my triplet was a 25/50/105. I'm keeping my eyes open for a Nikon F to S adapter which would allow me to pick up a CV 15 SL lens and use it on my S3-2000. Perhaps I should think about the 21mm focal lenght more as it's hard to find the adapter.
Hope I was able to add a bit of confusion.
B2 (;->
Jon, you could always grit your teeth and put the Contax 21 on your nikons.... The Zeiss lens works well on my SP
I've certainly been tempted before, Mark! If I come across one for the right price, there's a high probability it will follow me home
ray*j*gun
Veteran
I have an S3 and the 21mm........tremendous combination. I shoot color mostly and the lens is very sharp and easy to use....it comes with an accessory focus ring that makes the handling excellent. The VF is also WONDERFUL.
Bob Michaels
nobody special
I have both in M mount. They are very different lenses to me. Optically they are both excellent and similar in quality. But I find the field of view, and thus usage, to be very different.
You need to decide if you want the FOV of a 21mm or a 25mm lens and not base your decision on the optical quality.
FWIW, my five lenses are 50, 35, 28, 25 & 21mm. I don't carry them all but certainly use them all. I will say the 35, 28 & 25mm get the most use.
You need to decide if you want the FOV of a 21mm or a 25mm lens and not base your decision on the optical quality.
FWIW, my five lenses are 50, 35, 28, 25 & 21mm. I don't carry them all but certainly use them all. I will say the 35, 28 & 25mm get the most use.
Share: