Two of my customers sold extensive Leica SL2 outfits and moved very happily to the Nikon ZF and Voigtlander manual focus lenses.
Who else has made the move? Or is contemplating it ?
Who else has made the move? Or is contemplating it ?
Who has moved to the Nikon ZF?
- Thread starter CameraQuest
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 178
- Views 25K
Jamie Pillers
Skeptic
I did. Sold off all the Fuji gear and bought the Zf and the two small primes, 28 and 40. Haven’t made many images yet; just finishing up setting up camera features to my liking.
Designing a grip for it. Pleased with first prototype! Really helps to have thumb support.
Darthfeeble
But you can call me Steve
I got a Z7 a couple years ago but not to replace any particular camera. I wanted the megapixels for Landscapes. I tried using my M mount lenses and my feeble eyes just don't do manual focus on the Mirrorless arrangement. I wish I did better but the time it takes me to feel I have focus is aggravating, my patience is even worse than my eyesight I guess. All that said the results from the camera are very impressive. I'm saving to buy a digital back for my Hasselblad, that will replace the Nikon.
I switched from Fuji to a Z6 and only use manual focus. The manual focus features of the Zf are impressive...
gavinlg
Veteran
Switched from Fuji to the ZF. All I wanted is a full frame camera with manual controls. Still like the Fuji's but full frame gets me.
maddoc
... likes film again.
I rented the Voigtländer 40/1.2 in Z-mount over the weekend to test it with my Z7II, got some nice results and liked the manual focus and aperture rings a lot. That lens paired with the ZF could be my FF dream set-up, replacing my Fujifilm cameras (XPRO3/XT3), that I like for their manual controls.
wlewisiii
Veteran
If anything expensive breaks on either of my D810 or my M type 240? Then, I'll be deciding between an ZF or a Z6 and a handful of lens adapters (for M, LTM, F & S mounts)
Honestly, though, not unless that happens. I'm happy with what I have and I can't afford a Z &/or native lenses to play with considering my (lack of) budget and what I have invested in legacy glass already.
Honestly, though, not unless that happens. I'm happy with what I have and I can't afford a Z &/or native lenses to play with considering my (lack of) budget and what I have invested in legacy glass already.
JohnGellings
Well-known
If there was ever a non-Leica digital camera made for the RFF who likes manual focus lenses, this has to be it. However, it just doesn't look right to e with the majority of the Nikon Z lenses. I’m sticking with Fuji, but I get its popularity here.
Last edited:
mapgraphs
Established
A VM 40mm Nokton has been glued to my Z7 since the end of 2018. A 28mm f/2 Ultron II (edging out the F/1.9 Ultron slightly) and the 40mm f/2.8 Heliar make for a nice small kit on the Z7. No need for a Zf, but I fully understand the attraction.
Freakscene
Obscure member
Do you mean that to you the Zf camera doesn't look right with the Z lenses?
JohnGellings
Well-known
Yes, that’s exactly how I feel. Outside of the SE versions, the rest totally look like (and were obviously) designed with the PSAM Z bodies in mind. They just look wrong on the Zf. That said, the Voigtlander lenses look wonderful.
I get that these things don’t matter to some, but it does to me… and I use my cameras daily and take photography seriously. I’m not really a gear head but I like a fully designed system that looks and feels right in my hands. Also, I like AF over MF.
Last edited:
F
former member
Guest
I never "move" to a new camera/system, just assimilate more of them like the Borg.
Last year I picked up a Z5, and am amazed by the ease of use with manual focus lenses.
This year- I'll add a Zf to have a two-body system to handle a couple hundred manual focus lenses. I bought most of the required adapters already.
I might even get the "kit" with the 40/2, it's cheap. Will be my retirement present to myself.
Last year I picked up a Z5, and am amazed by the ease of use with manual focus lenses.
This year- I'll add a Zf to have a two-body system to handle a couple hundred manual focus lenses. I bought most of the required adapters already.
I might even get the "kit" with the 40/2, it's cheap. Will be my retirement present to myself.
shawn
Veteran
It would be great if Sigma expanded their Z mount lenses to the I series lenses. Full metal bodies, metal control rungs, metal lens hoods, aperture control, nice sized, great optics, AF (or MF) and reasonable cost. They would likely look/feel great on the Zf. On my PASM S1R they make it act more like how I used my Fuji's. I leave the camera in A mode and then I adjust the aperture on the lens. If I want to shoot full auto I just set the lens to A.
JoeV
Thin Air, Bright Sun
Can anyone comment on image quality of Leica M-mount lenses on the Zf? How is the off-axis quality? Does the Zf sensor have micro-lenses to improve off-axis image quality?
JohnGellings
Well-known
I think they will and that would be great. I love the 65mm f2 myself.
olakiril
Well-known
It will be nice to see ..
In the meantime:
How to Adapt Rangefinder Lenses to Nikon Mirrorless by Ken Rockwell
How to Adapt Rangefinder Lenses to Nikon Mirrorless by Ken Rockwell
www.kenrockwell.com
olakiril
Well-known
Yep same here. Lenses from other companies seem to get the "Nikon aesthetics" & manual controls better than Nikon 🤦♂️:
While it would be nice to have the "Ferrari" version, I doubt it's going to happen.
My main issues are with the colors and EVF quality. The Nikon custom profiles is getting there but still doesn't get near the colors that you can get with custom lookup tables as you can with the new Panasonic S5ii. For now, I find the Fuji colors better than what Nikon can achieve. The EVF should have been the one from the Z8. Maybe 100-300$ extra but would have been totally worth it.
Sticking with my X-Pro3 until they at least open up a bit their custom profiles to allow for 3DLUTs.
gavinlg
Veteran
It's excellent. I have seen results from even the contax G biogon which is problematic on most digital sensors and it wasn't an issue. I've tried a bunch down to 28mm and no issues.
olakiril
Well-known
Correction: I found out that most of the complains were because they didn't turn off the energy saving mode.
Was really trying to find faults with Zf so I don't end up with yet one more camera..
