FrankS
Registered User
Jaap, I"m okay with the existing cache of sunset photos, I just don't thihnk we need to add more.
(This is all tongue in cheek, you know, right?) 🙂
(This is all tongue in cheek, you know, right?) 🙂
But, it does... sort of. In clockwork mechanisms 'quiet' equals tighter tolerances. Tighter tolerances = more challenging engineering/manufacturing. More challenging engineering/manuafacturing = higher cost. Higher cost = evidence of quality. In clockwork mechanisms this generally leads to greater accuracy and precision... when in proper working order and when properly adjusted. But the trade-off is that a little dirt might cause the clockwork to stop functioning, whereas a "lower quality" (e.g. noisier, looser, cheaper) clockwork mechanism will keep running... albeit psooibly less precisely and less accurately. It's a trade-off that must be made based on user needs/requirements.back alley said:... seems we have been trained to believe that quiet equals quality ...
back alley said:good morning all!
this has been quite the discussion so far and civil too!
from what i have read i conclude that marketing is a big factor and the influence of others to convince us of a need that may not necessarily exist. it seems we have been trained to believe that quiet equals quality.
but the key factor may well be our own insecurity in that we are self conscious about taking people pictures and prefer a stealthy approach where attention is not directed at us.
perhaps i'll view this differently after my morning coffee or after more arguments have been made.
joe
Sparrow said:So in effect you’re saying we’re in part being tricked by the manufactures and in part victims of our own insecurities and reluctance to take responsibility for our actions?
PS😀
Sparrow said:So in effect you’re saying we’re in part being tricked by the manufactures and in part victims of our own insecurities and reluctance to take responsibility for our actions?
PS😀
Sparrow said:So in effect you’re saying we’re in part being tricked by the manufactures and in part victims of our own insecurities and reluctance to take responsibility for our actions?
PS😀
OK, let me restate, I buy this argument, but the trickster is not necessary the manufacturers, but also the users who have created an artificial need.
__________________
Dad with a Camera
My Gallery
rover's world
gabrielma said:Joe: the "you" is not you you. It's a general you.
One can get so misinterpreted (or like a dear leader would say, misinterpretated)
I guess I forgot the " 😀 "
Sparrow said:It’s whatever the received wisdom is, few people here are able actually test any of these specifications we base our opinions on, we only know what we are told by others. We are open to all types of manipulation, from a number of sources I know a bad lens review will have me doubting the evidence of my own eyes, and good one make me see or at least look for things that aren’t there.
back alley said:one of my favourite posters from the 60's...
"a man can make the same mistake forever and call it experience."
joe
back alley said:one of my favourite posters from the 60's...
"a man can make the same mistake forever and call it experience."
joe
Crasis said:Being older than an M3 must be an interesting 'experience' 😀