Crasis
Well-known
back alley said:and i assume you have such same aspirations my young friend?
hard to achieve if you piss off a sicilian...😉
j/k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aww, but I've always wanted to wake up with a horse-head on my pillow beside me 🙁
back alley said:and i assume you have such same aspirations my young friend?
hard to achieve if you piss off a sicilian...😉
j/k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
airds said:So I think the 'Batteries Not Included' blog man is waffling a bit when he says:
"Footnote: The Olympus 35SPn is a great, compact camera with an excellent lens - but it's not the one I would bring with me for candid street photograpy a lot due to the shutter sound."
Suppose he's got to justify his other expensive kit though ;-)
FrankS said:But it is called received wisdom not received nonsense. It must hold some value, the experiences of those that came before us.
rover said:***click***
chris91387 said:anyone want to start a mac vs. pc war?
Rich Silfver said:You can suppose whatever you want but I have no need to justify my other cameras (none of them costing > $1,000 by the way). Not sure what called for that comment.
Did you note the smiley?
I like the Olympus 35Pn - but it's louder than other cameras I have - so I may be less inclined to use it for certain type of photography. Why is that 'waffling' or 'justifying'?[/QUOTE]
The article was about using it for candid street photography - where I am sure there will be more ambient noise that the difference in the apparent level of shutter sounds - especially if the subject is further away that the camera is from your ear .......
The article was about using it for candid street photography - where I am sure there will be more ambient noise that the difference in the apparent level of shutter sounds - especially if the subject is further away that the camera is from your ear .......
airds said:The article was about using it for candid street photography - where I am sure there will be more ambient noise that the difference in the apparent level of shutter sounds - especially if the subject is further away that the camera is from your ear .......
That's ok, Joe. I'm (almost) used to it; people thinking I get pissed off easily. Which in the U.K. would mean I get drunk easily, but that's another matter entirely.back alley said:thanks for the clarification, i thought i pissed you off.
I see you are secure and unabated by marketing (and engineering) jibbi-jabba 😉chris91387 said:***CLICK***
***CLICK***
***CLICK***
***CLICK***
***CLICK***
that's the sound of one of my dream cameras: Nikon F2AS
gabrielma said:That's ok, Joe. I'm (almost) used to it; people thinking I get pissed off easily. Which in the U.K. would mean I get drunk easily, but that's another matter entirely.
I am so wubable, I weally am. I guess my eye-batting doesn't show online.
BrianShaw said:Wow, what a wonderfully versatile word.