rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Someone should really start a thread about it.
Why do you think of the price of the new 50mm Summicron?
- Thread starter robofc
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 47
- Views 5K
Clancycoop
Established
Araakii
Well-known
To those who can afford it, money/cash has even higher diminishing returns. Once all your lusts are taken care of, there's very little an extra $10,000 can do for you.
PMCC
Late adopter.
I'm sure one could blow 10K on something worthwhile beyond pure amusement. Just takes a little imagination.
J. Borger
Well-known
Leica just made what they can make like no other: the best 50mm lens technical possible. Nobody is forced to buy it. It is a flagship product which helps maintain the company's image as a first class innovative lensbuilder. In that sense it is a very wise marketing decision to build it. Will it sell?? Does not matter!
The "only for the rich and famous" and "for collector's and not for photographers" arguments float the net after every single productintroduction by Leica.
Point is the rich and famous buy only the best they can afford and in the long history of photography there are only very few serious photographers who never owned or used a Leica. Often only for personal work.
So if you can not afford: look at the 2nd hand market or buy Zeiss or Voightlander and be happy. I admire Ferrari for the way they build their cars, without envy not being able to afford one. Waite.... if i would sell my house i could even afford two of them.
So it is also about priorities in life.
For the record: i will not buy the new 50 summicron!!
The "only for the rich and famous" and "for collector's and not for photographers" arguments float the net after every single productintroduction by Leica.
Point is the rich and famous buy only the best they can afford and in the long history of photography there are only very few serious photographers who never owned or used a Leica. Often only for personal work.
So if you can not afford: look at the 2nd hand market or buy Zeiss or Voightlander and be happy. I admire Ferrari for the way they build their cars, without envy not being able to afford one. Waite.... if i would sell my house i could even afford two of them.
So it is also about priorities in life.
For the record: i will not buy the new 50 summicron!!
Moriturii
Well-known
I will buy one for my mom. She has a Sony NEX, so I need to get an adapter as well. But I am sure she will enjoy her new lens.
Archlich
Well-known
Someone would argue (and had argued) that since you use Leica, you pay the Leica price.
From the normal photog's perspective a $2,295 50/2 lens is ridiculous enough. That is the Leica price many here are willing to pay fo; yet even that has its limit, which is known as sanity.
That is, the $7,150 price tag is way beyond what used to be the Leica price; or more precisely, Leica is trying to redefine the term, that people paying $2,000 for a 50/2 are not the ones paying enough, and should be ruled out.
Utter lunacy out of greed, that is.
From the normal photog's perspective a $2,295 50/2 lens is ridiculous enough. That is the Leica price many here are willing to pay fo; yet even that has its limit, which is known as sanity.
That is, the $7,150 price tag is way beyond what used to be the Leica price; or more precisely, Leica is trying to redefine the term, that people paying $2,000 for a 50/2 are not the ones paying enough, and should be ruled out.
Utter lunacy out of greed, that is.
matt335
Well-known
This makes a lot of sense. The 50mm was due for an upgrade. I read the review and specs. It's an APO and ASPH. Either way I bet it sings sweetly on either the new M Monochrome or a film body.
Araakii
Well-known
Greed is when someone wants to buy something that's out of their purchasing power for cheap.
Araakii
Well-known
And a 50mm f2 asph is exactly that "something worthwhile".
DominikDUK
Well-known
I wonder what a Zeiss lens with same specs would cost. The new Leica Motion Picutre lenses are superb, but the Zeiss are better. So I imagine that Zeiss Oberkochen can produce an equal or better lens than Leica if they set their mind to it.
The price is high and I personaly feel that too much correction and sharpness isn't really all that great. But leica will have a market for this lens, and they will sell a lot of it. I personaly can't afford the lens, but I think its a good move from Leica. Entry level Summicron> Intermediate Level Summilux > Pro Level APO Summicron. The Levels are equal to Leica mystique or the Leica club
Dominik
The price is high and I personaly feel that too much correction and sharpness isn't really all that great. But leica will have a market for this lens, and they will sell a lot of it. I personaly can't afford the lens, but I think its a good move from Leica. Entry level Summicron> Intermediate Level Summilux > Pro Level APO Summicron. The Levels are equal to Leica mystique or the Leica club
Dominik
Last edited:
TR3B
Established
$$$$$
$$$$$
My 50mm stable:
Summitar= $275
Summarit=$275
Summicron=$175
summilux=$700
I love each and every one for different reasons.... i need nothing
$$$$$
My 50mm stable:
Summitar= $275
Summarit=$275
Summicron=$175
summilux=$700
I love each and every one for different reasons.... i need nothing
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
In other words, all the emotional uproar we've seen over the last days is the clamouring of people who've been paying $2,000 for 50/f2 lenses because it makes them feel special, but now there's something better that even they cannot afford and now they feel ruled out.... is that what you mean?
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
That is not the commonly accepted definition of that word. Not even close. I infer that you're speaking some language other than English.
Araakii
Well-known
I feel like I am really taking this too seriously, but oh well.
greed
[greed] Show IPA
noun excessive or rapacious desire, especially for wealth or possessions.
If someone's desire to own the best, top of the line 35mm lens even if his or her financials does not permit is not considered an excessive desire for possession, I do not know what is.
I will not buy the 50mm summicron by the way although I can afford it. Like many others here I feel like I can spend the money on other things. But I do not point my fingers at the seller for not selling it to me for 2 grand.
In fact, greed is already abundant in this forum (myself included). I would actually consider even owning the old 35mm summicron v5 to be excessive.
Steve M.
Veteran
Well, I don't know. I still say Leica's reputation comes from lenses that they used to make. So a new Leica lens is of little value to me. The old stuff is that good.
semilog
curmudgeonly optimist
Probably we both are. We should definitely go shooting some time. I do like your work posted to flickr. 😀
Araakii
Well-known
Yes, obviously. And some people also feel that they need to keep up-to-date with the best stuff because either they are photographers so they have a right to, or because they need to use the best gears to make sure that their stuff remains good.
Similar threads
