JPSuisse
Well-known
Hi there all you RFFers!
I'm inclined to think of it like this:
Lens-centrically: On my M8, I'm using a 50 Lux ASPH and a 28 Chron ASPH. On my MP, I've got a 35 Lux ASPH and 75 Chron ASPH. Either way, I don't have 1.4 option either long or short for my preferred walk around focal lengths.
Egronomically: the filters a pain on the M8, if you start swapping between film and digital. Forget, and you screw up important pictures.
Quality: yeah, the M9 files look a little less clinical.
--> I'm keeping my M8 a little while longer, as I can tolerate the inconvenience for the extra $$ it would cost!
--> If I weren't using film, I probably wouldn't even think about the M9 given thet fact that I already have an M8.
JP
I'm inclined to think of it like this:
Lens-centrically: On my M8, I'm using a 50 Lux ASPH and a 28 Chron ASPH. On my MP, I've got a 35 Lux ASPH and 75 Chron ASPH. Either way, I don't have 1.4 option either long or short for my preferred walk around focal lengths.
Egronomically: the filters a pain on the M8, if you start swapping between film and digital. Forget, and you screw up important pictures.
Quality: yeah, the M9 files look a little less clinical.
--> I'm keeping my M8 a little while longer, as I can tolerate the inconvenience for the extra $$ it would cost!
--> If I weren't using film, I probably wouldn't even think about the M9 given thet fact that I already have an M8.
JP
Last edited: