ibcrewin
Ah looky looky
This thread is useless with out pics! 🙂
Maybe it was user error, but I found the 400H to be excessively grainy. It was more in line with Portra 800 in my tests...
This thread is useless with out pics! 🙂
The only thing that worries me about Kodak's current line up is that both Ektar 100 and Portra 400 are so good that they may decide they don't ever need to improve them.
Of course, films can always be improved. But the sales 'suits' don't always understand that. In my opinion Kodak took a wrong turn when they didn't appoint Carl Kohrt to run the company in 2000 or whenever it was.
R.
True, but Ektar 100 and the continuing improvements to Portra 400 haven't been motivated by sales to still shooters, but are more a welcome byproduct of R&D for motion-picture stock. So long as Hollywood keeps putting movies on film, we might see further improvements in color neg films down the line.